[Pacemaker] Release candidate: 1.1.10-rc3

[Andrew Beekhof]

On 06/06/2013, at 3:41 PM, Larry Brigman <larry.brigman at gmail.com> wrote:

> I pulled the git tree but it failed to build in a number of ways when trying to build on centos 5.9.
> 
> make rpm-dep:
> ....
> Checking for new repos for mirrors
> Enabling epel-source repository
> Enabling rpmfusion-free-updates-testing-source repository
> No such package(s): pacemaker-fedora.spec.src
> make: *** [rpm-dep] Error 1
> 
> Since I have built 1.1.5 on this machine I went for a manual config.
> Instead I just manually did ./autogen.sh && ./configure
> It shows 1.1.9 at the end of configure.
> 
> make rc:
>  make rc
> sort: invalid option -- V
> Try `sort --help' for more information.

Urgh.  Looks like RHEL5 is older than "sort -V".

See if this gets you any further:  make TAG=Pacemaker-1.1.10-rc3 rpm


> make TAG= rpm
> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/devel/pacemaker/pacemaker'
> rm -f pacemaker-dirty.tar.* pacemaker-tip.tar.* pacemaker-HEAD.tar.*
> if [ ! -f ClusterLabs-pacemaker-.tar.gz ]; then                                \
>             rm -f pacemaker.tar.*;                                             \
>             if [  = dirty ]; then                                       \
>                 git commit -m "DO-NOT-PUSH" -a;                                \
>                 git archive --prefix=ClusterLabs-pacemaker-/ HEAD | gzip > ClusterLabs-pacemaker-.tar.gz;       \
>                 git reset --mixed HEAD^;                                       \
>             else                                                               \
>                 git archive --prefix=ClusterLabs-pacemaker-/  | gzip > ClusterLabs-pacemaker-.tar.gz;   \
>             fi;                                                                \
>             echo `date`: Rebuilt ClusterLabs-pacemaker-.tar.gz;                \
>         else                                                                   \
>             echo `date`: Using existing tarball: ClusterLabs-pacemaker-.tar.gz;\
>         fi
> Wed Jun 5 22:30:54 PDT 2013: Using existing tarball: ClusterLabs-pacemaker-.tar.gz
> sort: invalid option -- V
> Try `sort --help' for more information.
> rm -f *.src.rpm
> cp pacemaker-fedora.spec pacemaker.spec
> if [ -e build.counter ]; then                                   \
>                 echo 1 > build.counter;                         \
>         fi
> sed -i.sed 's/Source0:.*/Source0:\ ClusterLabs-pacemaker-.tar.gz/' pacemaker.spec
> sed -i.sed 's/global\ specversion.*/global\ specversion\ 1/' pacemaker.spec
> sed -i.sed 's/global\ upstream_version.*/global\ upstream_version\ /' pacemaker.spec
> sed -i.sed 's/global\ upstream_prefix.*/global\ upstream_prefix\ ClusterLabs-pacemaker/' pacemaker.spec
> case  in                                                                \
>                 Pacemaker*) sed -i.sed 's/Version:.*/Version:\ /' pacemaker.spec;;              \
>                 *)          sed -i.sed 's/Version:.*/Version:\ /' pacemaker.spec;;      \
>         esac
> /bin/sh: -c: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `Pacemaker*'
> /bin/sh: -c: line 1: `  Pacemaker*) sed -i.sed 's/Version:.*/Version:\ /' pacemaker.spec;;              \'
> make[1]: *** [srpm-fedora] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/devel/pacemaker/pacemaker'
> make: *** [rc] Error 2
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Kirill Proskurin <k.proskurin at corp.mail.ru> wrote:
> On 6/5/13 14:59 , Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> waiting for the RHEL 6.x build of pacemaker 1.1.10 I want to ask
> whether there can be done something for finding the memory leaks.
> If so, than explain the steps needed in detail. Currently there
> are two real clusters available to do testing.
> 
> (Questions: Do you need logs? Debug-Log? Some excerpt? Shall we look
> for certain patterns?)
> 
> 
> Same thing, but for RHEL 5.
> If I can get RHEL5 compatible rpm I can test it on my cluster(6 clusters running)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:andrew at beekhof.net]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2013 04:26
> An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Release candidate: 1.1.10-rc3
> 
> 
> On 23/05/2013, at 12:33 PM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
> 
> Please keep the bug reports coming in.  There is a good chances that
> this will be the final release candidate and 1.1.10 will be tagged on
> May 30th.
> 
> I am delaying rc4 until we can get definitive closure on the crmd memory
> leak(s).
> Valgrind has given it a clean bill of health, however the process still
> appears to be growing over time and at strange intervals, so its not yet
> clear what is responsible.
> 
> Beyond fixes for memory leaks, rc4 will include a workaround for
> inconsistent tls handshake behavior between gnutls versions and some
> improvements to the way crm_resource can be used to move resources around.
> I hope to provide more detail soon.
> 
> -- Andrew
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Proskurin Kirill
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org