[Pacemaker] Release candidate: 1.1.10-rc3

[Larry Brigman]

I pulled the git tree but it failed to build in a number of ways when
trying to build on centos 5.9.

make rpm-dep:
....
Checking for new repos for mirrors
Enabling epel-source repository
Enabling rpmfusion-free-updates-testing-source repository
No such package(s): pacemaker-fedora.spec.src
make: *** [rpm-dep] Error 1

Since I have built 1.1.5 on this machine I went for a manual config.
Instead I just manually did ./autogen.sh && ./configure
It shows 1.1.9 at the end of configure.

make rc:
* make rc*
*sort: invalid option -- V*
*Try `sort --help' for more information.*
*make TAG= rpm*
*make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/devel/pacemaker/pacemaker'*
*rm -f pacemaker-dirty.tar.* pacemaker-tip.tar.* pacemaker-HEAD.tar.**
*if [ ! -f ClusterLabs-pacemaker-.tar.gz ]; then
     \*
*            rm -f pacemaker.tar.*;
    \*
*            if [  = dirty ]; then                                       \*
*                git commit -m "DO-NOT-PUSH" -a;
     \*
*                git archive --prefix=ClusterLabs-pacemaker-/ HEAD | gzip >
ClusterLabs-pacemaker-.tar.gz;       \*
*                git reset --mixed HEAD^;
    \*
*            else
    \*
*                git archive --prefix=ClusterLabs-pacemaker-/  | gzip >
ClusterLabs-pacemaker-.tar.gz;   \*
*            fi;
     \*
*            echo `date`: Rebuilt ClusterLabs-pacemaker-.tar.gz;
     \*
*        else
    \*
*            echo `date`: Using existing tarball:
ClusterLabs-pacemaker-.tar.gz;\*
*        fi*
*Wed Jun 5 22:30:54 PDT 2013: Using existing tarball:
ClusterLabs-pacemaker-.tar.gz*
*sort: invalid option -- V*
*Try `sort --help' for more information.*
*rm -f *.src.rpm*
*cp pacemaker-fedora.spec pacemaker.spec*
*if [ -e build.counter ]; then                                   \*
*                echo 1 > build.counter;                         \*
*        fi*
*sed -i.sed 's/Source0:.*/Source0:\ ClusterLabs-pacemaker-.tar.gz/'
pacemaker.spec*
*sed -i.sed 's/global\ specversion.*/global\ specversion\ 1/' pacemaker.spec
*
*sed -i.sed 's/global\ upstream_version.*/global\ upstream_version\ /'
pacemaker.spec*
*sed -i.sed 's/global\ upstream_prefix.*/global\ upstream_prefix\
ClusterLabs-pacemaker/' pacemaker.spec*
*case  in                                                                \*
*                Pacemaker*) sed -i.sed 's/Version:.*/Version:\ /'
pacemaker.spec;;              \*
*                *)          sed -i.sed 's/Version:.*/Version:\ /'
pacemaker.spec;;      \*
*        esac*
*/bin/sh: -c: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `Pacemaker*'*
*/bin/sh: -c: line 1: `  Pacemaker*) sed -i.sed 's/Version:.*/Version:\ /'
pacemaker.spec;;              \'*
*make[1]: *** [srpm-fedora] Error 2*
*make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/devel/pacemaker/pacemaker'*
*make: *** [rc] Error 2*





On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Kirill Proskurin
<k.proskurin at corp.mail.ru>wrote:

> On 6/5/13 14:59 , Andreas Mock wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> waiting for the RHEL 6.x build of pacemaker 1.1.10 I want to ask
>> whether there can be done something for finding the memory leaks.
>> If so, than explain the steps needed in detail. Currently there
>> are two real clusters available to do testing.
>>
>> (Questions: Do you need logs? Debug-Log? Some excerpt? Shall we look
>> for certain patterns?)
>>
>
>
> Same thing, but for RHEL 5.
> If I can get RHEL5 compatible rpm I can test it on my cluster(6 clusters
> running)
>
>
>
>>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:andrew at beekhof.net]
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2013 04:26
>> An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
>> Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Release candidate: 1.1.10-rc3
>>
>>
>> On 23/05/2013, at 12:33 PM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>>
>>  Please keep the bug reports coming in.  There is a good chances that
>>> this will be the final release candidate and 1.1.10 will be tagged on
>>> May 30th.
>>>
>>
>> I am delaying rc4 until we can get definitive closure on the crmd memory
>> leak(s).
>> Valgrind has given it a clean bill of health, however the process still
>> appears to be growing over time and at strange intervals, so its not yet
>> clear what is responsible.
>>
>> Beyond fixes for memory leaks, rc4 will include a workaround for
>> inconsistent tls handshake behavior between gnutls versions and some
>> improvements to the way crm_resource can be used to move resources around.
>> I hope to provide more detail soon.
>>
>> -- Andrew
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Proskurin Kirill
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/**mailman/listinfo/pacemaker<http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker>
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/**doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf<http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf>
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20130605/3d0926f2/attachment-0003.html>