[Pacemaker] order required if group is present?

[Bauer, Stefan (IZLBW Extern)]

Hi together,

thank you very much for pointing that out.

stefan

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:andrew at beekhof.net] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Juli 2013 01:24
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] order required if group is present?


On 26/07/2013, at 12:59 AM, Andreas Mock <Andreas.Mock at web.de> wrote:

> Hi Stefan,
>  
> a) yes, the ordered behaviour is intentional.
> b) In former version you could change this behaviour with an attribute.
> But this attribute is depreciated in newer versions of pacemaker.
> c) The solution for parallel starting resources are resource sets.

d) groups are essentially a shortcut for a colocation and ordering constraints.