[Pacemaker] order required if group is present?

[Andrew Beekhof]

On 26/07/2013, at 12:59 AM, Andreas Mock <Andreas.Mock at web.de> wrote:

> Hi Stefan,
>  
> a) yes, the ordered behaviour is intentional.
> b) In former version you could change this behaviour with an attribute.
> But this attribute is depreciated in newer versions of pacemaker.
> c) The solution for parallel starting resources are resource sets.

d) groups are essentially a shortcut for a colocation and ordering constraints.

>  
> Best regards
> Andreas Mock
>  
> P.S.: Always give information about used versions of elements of
> the cluster stack. Behaviour changed over time.
>  
>  
> Von: Bauer, Stefan (IZLBW Extern) [mailto:Stefan.Bauer at iz.bwl.de] 
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Juli 2013 12:53
> An: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> Betreff: [Pacemaker] order required if group is present?
>  
> Hi List,
>  
> i have 5 resources configured (p_bond1, p_conntrackd, p_vlan118,p_vlan119, p_openvpn)
>  
> additionally I have put all of them in a group with:
>  
> group cluster1 p_bond1,p_vlan118,p_vlan119,p_openvpn,p_conntrackd
>  
> By this, crm is starting the resources in the order, the group is defined (p_bond1,p_vlan118 and so on…)
>  
> Is this an expected behavior? If so, it’s providing the function `order` was made for?
>  
> Thanks in advance
>  
> Stefan
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org