[Pacemaker] Fixed! - Re: Problem with dual-PDU fencing node with redundant PSUs

Digimer lists at alteeve.ca
Thu Jul 18 14:43:07 EDT 2013


On 28/06/13 10:20, Digimer wrote:
> On 06/28/2013 03:22 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>> On 2013-06-27T12:53:01, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> primitive fence_n01_psu1_off stonith:fence_apc_snmp \
>>>          params ipaddr="an-p01" pcmk_reboot_action="off" port="1"
>>> pcmk_host_list="an-c03n01.alteeve.ca"
>>> primitive fence_n01_psu1_on stonith:fence_apc_snmp \
>>>          params ipaddr="an-p01" pcmk_reboot_action="on" port="1"
>>> pcmk_host_list="an-c03n01.alteeve.ca"
>>
>> So every device twice, including location constraints? I see potential
>> for optimization by improving how the fence code handles this ... That's
>> abhorrently complex. (And I'm not sure the 'action' parameter ought to
>> be overwritten.)
>
> Andrew said yesterday that this will no longer be the case as of 1.1.10.
>  From then on, 'action="..."' will be honoured.

I've now tested this with 1.1.10 rc6 and 'action="..."' was properly 
honoured.

-- 
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without 
access to education?




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list