[Pacemaker] Clarification on pacemaker HA services

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Shridhar Sahukar <ssahukar at movik.com>wrote:

>  No. I have subscribed as ssahukar at movik.com.
>

Not to the pacemaker list. I checked.


> But my thunderbird client is still referring to my email id as
> "ssahukar at movik.net" <ssahukar at movik.net> (our domain was recently
> changed from .com to .net, but my client is still referring to the old
> one). I guess this could be the problem. Now I have changed the setting, so
> hope this response with the list alias in cc will make it to the mailing
> list.
>
> Regards,
> Shridhar
>
>
> On 01/09/2013 04:39 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> It seems to be because you subscribed as shravan.mishra at gmail.com<http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/options/pacemaker/shravan.mishra--at--gmail.com> but
> are attempting to post as ssahukar at movik.net.
> You need to send from the same address you subscribed with.
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Shridhar Sahukar <ssahukar at movik.net>wrote:
>
>>  I did. I am getting all other emails posted on the mailing list. So I
>> was wondering if the list is moderated.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Shridhar
>>
>>
>> On 01/03/2013 08:26 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> Did you subscribe before sending?
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Shridhar Sahukar <ssahukar at movik.net>wrote:
>>
>>>  Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> I am not sure why the following mail didn't appear on the mailing list.
>>> Could you please help with some inputs?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Shridhar
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------  Subject: Clarification on pacemaker
>>> HA services  Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 12:37:27 -0500  From: Shridhar
>>> Sahukar <ssahukar at movik.net> <ssahukar at movik.net>  Reply-To:
>>> ssahukar at movik.net  Organization: Movik Networks Pvt Ltd  To:
>>> pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have worked with high availability middleware like OpenSAF, OpenAIS
>>> which are based on SAForum specifications. I have a requirement for a
>>> similar middleware that runs on top of corosync (more specifically the
>>> totem protocol implementation) and am considering using pacemaker
>>> (OpenAIS was a good fit, but since it is discontinued, I am looking for
>>> an alternative). I see that pacemaker can also support various
>>> redundancy models, but I am not sure if it provides functionality close
>>> to AMF functionality specified in SAForum specs.
>>>
>>> Could you please provide some comparison of pacemaker's features against
>>> an SAForum middleware in terms of HA support?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Shridhar
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20130111/c38616f1/attachment.htm>