[Pacemaker] Clarification on pacemaker HA services

[Shridhar Sahukar]

No. I have subscribed as ssahukar at movik.com. But my thunderbird client 
is still referring to my email id as "ssahukar at movik.net" (our domain 
was recently changed from .com to .net, but my client is still referring 
to the old one). I guess this could be the problem. Now I have changed 
the setting, so hope this response with the list alias in cc will make 
it to the mailing list.

Regards,
Shridhar

On 01/09/2013 04:39 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> It seems to be because you subscribed as shravan.mishra at gmail.com 
> <http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/options/pacemaker/shravan.mishra--at--gmail.com> but 
> are attempting to post as ssahukar at movik.net <mailto:ssahukar at movik.net>.
> You need to send from the same address you subscribed with.
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Shridhar Sahukar <ssahukar at movik.net 
> <mailto:ssahukar at movik.net>> wrote:
>
>     I did. I am getting all other emails posted on the mailing list.
>     So I was wondering if the list is moderated.
>
>     Regards,
>     Shridhar
>
>
>     On 01/03/2013 08:26 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>     Did you subscribe before sending?
>>
>>     On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Shridhar Sahukar
>>     <ssahukar at movik.net <mailto:ssahukar at movik.net>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi Andrew,
>>
>>         I am not sure why the following mail didn't appear on the
>>         mailing list. Could you please help with some inputs?
>>
>>         Regards,
>>         Shridhar
>>
>>
>>         -------- Original Message --------
>>         Subject: 	Clarification on pacemaker HA services
>>         Date: 	Fri, 28 Dec 2012 12:37:27 -0500
>>         From: 	Shridhar Sahukar <ssahukar at movik.net>
>>         <mailto:ssahukar at movik.net>
>>         Reply-To: 	ssahukar at movik.net <mailto:ssahukar at movik.net>
>>         Organization: 	Movik Networks Pvt Ltd
>>         To: 	pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>         <mailto:pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org>
>>
>>
>>
>>         Hi,
>>
>>         I have worked with high availability middleware like OpenSAF, OpenAIS
>>         which are based on SAForum specifications. I have a requirement for a
>>         similar middleware that runs on top of corosync (more specifically the
>>         totem protocol implementation) and am considering using pacemaker
>>         (OpenAIS was a good fit, but since it is discontinued, I am looking for
>>         an alternative). I see that pacemaker can also support various
>>         redundancy models, but I am not sure if it provides functionality close
>>         to AMF functionality specified in SAForum specs.
>>
>>         Could you please provide some comparison of pacemaker's features against
>>         an SAForum middleware in terms of HA support?
>>
>>         Regards,
>>         Shridhar
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20130110/4afdc7f0/attachment.htm>