[Pacemaker] Anticolocation problem

Dimokritos Stamatakis dimstamat at gmail.com
Fri Feb 3 10:43:21 UTC 2012 

Hello,
Did you receive my previous email responding your question about cibadmin -Ql command output??

Many thanks,
Dimos.

On 3 Φεβ 2012, at 4:50 π.μ., Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:

> The latest code appears to behave ok, so perhaps the problem was since fixed.
> Can you send me the output from cibadmin -Ql when the cluster is in
> this state so I can confirm?
> 
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:38 PM, agutxi Agustin <agutxisol at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> I'm trying to setup some anticolocation rules, but I'm finding some
>> strange behaviour and not getting the desired effect, so  I wonder if
>> I'm missing something or there is really some problem with my
>> setting.If you could lend me a hand that would be great.
>> 
>> The scenario: 3 Dummy resources running based on utilization (1 core
>> for each resource running) on 2 nodes, each with 2 cores capacity.
>> Plus: Anticolocation rules: No 2 resources can run in the same node (I
>> know in this case I could limit this with utilization, but this is
>> just a test case from a bigger scenario where I detected the problem)
>> Configuration:
>> _______________________________________________________________________________
>> crm(live)# configure show
>> node vmHost1 \
>>       utilization cores="2"
>> node vmHost2 \
>>       utilization cores="2"
>> primitive DummyVM1 ocf:pacemaker:Dummy \
>>       op monitor interval="60s" timeout="60s" \
>>       op start on-fail="restart" interval="0" \
>>       op stop on-fail="ignore" interval="0" \
>>       utilization cores="1" \
>>       meta is-managed="true" migration-threshold="2" target-role="Started"
>> primitive DummyVM2 ocf:pacemaker:Dummy \
>>       op monitor interval="60s" timeout="60s" \
>>       op start on-fail="restart" interval="0" \
>>       op stop on-fail="ignore" interval="0" \
>>       utilization cores="1" \
>>       meta is-managed="true" migration-threshold="2" target-role="Started"
>> primitive DummyVM3 ocf:pacemaker:Dummy \
>>       op monitor interval="60s" timeout="60s" \
>>       op start on-fail="restart" interval="0" \
>>       op stop on-fail="ignore" interval="0" \
>>       utilization cores="1" \
>>       meta is-managed="true" migration-threshold="2" target-role="Stopped"
>> colocation antidummy12 -INF: DummyVM1 DummyVM2
>> colocation antidummy13 -INF: DummyVM1 DummyVM3
>> colocation antidummy23 -INF: DummyVM2 DummyVM3
>> property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \
>>       dc-version="1.1.6-9971ebba4494012a93c03b40a2c58ec0eb60f50c" \
>>       cluster-infrastructure="openais" \
>>       expected-quorum-votes="2" \
>>       stonith-enabled="false" \
>>       stop-all-resources="false" \
>>       placement-strategy="utilization" \
>>       no-quorum-policy="ignore" \
>>       cluster-infrastructure="openais" \
>>       stop-orphan-resources="true" \
>>       stop-orphan-actions="true" \
>>       symmetric-cluster="true" \
>>       last-lrm-refresh="1326975274"
>> rsc_defaults $id="rsc-options" \
>>       resource-stickiness="INFINITY"
>> _______________________________________________________________________________
>> 
>> Looking around for symmetric anti-collocation information, I found a
>> message where Andrew Beekhof stated:
>> 
>>>>>> colocation X-Y -2: X Y
>>>>>> colocation Y-X -2: Y X
>>>>>> 
>>>>> the second one is implied by the first and is therefore redundant
>>>>> 
>>>> If only that were true!
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> It is. I know exactly how my code works in this regard.
>>> More than likely a score of -2 is simply too low to have any effect.
>> 
>> so I was expecting my resources to prevent another resource from
>> running on the same node.
>> 
>> Test: I start 2 resources: DummyVM1 & DUmmyVM2: they correctly start
>> on vmHost1 and vmHost2, as expected (I don't care about location)
>> _______________________________________________________________________________
>> crm(live)# status
>> ============
>> Last updated: Mon Jan 30 13:33:19 2012
>> Last change: Mon Jan 30 13:30:21 2012 via cibadmin on vmHost1
>> Current DC: vmHost2 - partition with quorum
>> Version: 1.1.6-9971ebba4494012a93c03b40a2c58ec0eb60f50c
>> 2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes
>> 3 Resources configured.
>> ============
>> 
>> Online: [ vmHost1 vmHost2 ]
>> 
>> DummyVM1       (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started vmHost1
>> DummyVM2       (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started vmHost2
>> _______________________________________________________________________________
>> 
>> Then, I start the DummyVM3 resource:
>> 
>> _______________________________________________________________________________
>> crm(live)# resource start DummyVM3
>> crm(live)# status
>> ============
>> Last updated: Mon Jan 30 13:33:52 2012
>> Last change: Mon Jan 30 13:33:50 2012 via cibadmin on vmHost1
>> Current DC: vmHost2 - partition with quorum
>> Version: 1.1.6-9971ebba4494012a93c03b40a2c58ec0eb60f50c
>> 2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes
>> 3 Resources configured.
>> ============
>> 
>> Online: [ vmHost1 vmHost2 ]
>> 
>> DummyVM1       (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started vmHost1
>> DummyVM2       (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started vmHost2
>> DummyVM3       (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started vmHost1
>> _______________________________________________________________________________
>> 
>> and immediately DummyVM3 is started on vmHost1, though from my
>> understanding it shouldnt (anticolocation with -INF score).
>> I think the colocation scores are being ignored, is this possible?.
>> I checked with "ptest -saL" and it is not showing -INFINITY for my
>> colocation rules:
>> 
>> root at vmHost1:~# ptest -saL
>> Allocation scores:
>> native_color: DummyVM3 allocation score on vmHost1: INFINITY
>> native_color: DummyVM3 allocation score on vmHost2: 0
>> native_color: DummyVM2 allocation score on vmHost1: 0
>> native_color: DummyVM2 allocation score on vmHost2: INFINITY
>> native_color: DummyVM1 allocation score on vmHost1: INFINITY
>> native_color: DummyVM1 allocation score on vmHost2: 0
>> 
>> Can someone give me any hints as for what I am doing wrong?
>> Thank you guys,
>> 
>> Agustín
>> 
>> "Death: Human beings make life so interesting. Do you know, that in a
>> universe so full of wonders, they have managed to invent boredom." --
>> Terry Pratchett
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>> 
>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list