[Pacemaker] [PATCH] crm shell (configure node) for Heartbeat stack

[Dejan Muhamedagic]

Hi Kazunori-san,

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 05:50:53PM +0900, Kazunori INOUE wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> (2011/06/21 21:59), Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>> Hi Kazunori-san,
>>
>> Apologies for not getting back to you sooner.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 06:17:31PM +0900, Kazunori INOUE wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> (2011/05/27 19:32), Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Oh no.
>>>> Now you have duplicated all nodes, and will always get "unclean" nodes.
>>>>
>>>> Is this some variant of:
>>>> http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Initial_Configuration#A_Special_Note_for_People_Switching_Cluster_Stacks
>>>>
>>>> Could that be the root cause of your duplicate node instances with
>>>> different ids?
>>>>
>>> Yes.
>>> Corosync uses uname (output of 'uname -n') as ID of the node, and
>>> Heartbeat uses UUID as ID of the node. Therefore, on Heartbeat stack,
>>> unclean node is added when I loaded the following CLI.
>>> # cat test1.cli
>>> node srv-a1 utilization capacity="1"
>>> #
>>>
>>> Attached "crm_configure_node_for_hb.patch" replaces ID of node (uname)
>>> with UUID, after parsing the node ('node srv-a1 utilization capacity="1"')
>>> command.
>>> # crm -d configure load update test1.cli
>>> (snip)
>>> DEBUG: 1: cli_list: [['node', [['uname', 'srv-a1'], ['id', 'srv-a1']]], ['utilization', [['capacity', '1']]]]
>>> DEBUG: 1: id_replace:<srv-a1>  to<0cd9d2df-13fa-4b11-93d3-27a57192caeb>
>>> DEBUG: 1: cli_list: [['node', [['uname', 'srv-a1'], ['id', '0cd9d2df-13fa-4b11-93d3-27a57192caeb']]], ['utilization', [['capacity', '1']]]]
>>> (snip)
>>>
>>> In other words attached patch will get the same result as loading
>>> following cli.
>>> # cat test2.cli
>>> node $id="0cd9d2df-13fa-4b11-93d3-27a57192caeb" utilization capacity="1"
>>> #
>>> Is not this patch effective?
>>
>> Took a look at the patch, but I still need to investigate this
>> further. Unfortunately, my schedule got really tight lately.
>> I'll try to get to it as soon as I can.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dejan
>>
> How is the status of this problem?

Sorry to say none. I thought that one of you were on to it, but
obviously not so. I guess I mixed it with something else. I'll
see to it one of these days.

Thanks,

Dejan

> Thanks for your help.
> Kazunori INOUE
>
>>>> Or is only the crm shell getting it wrong when updating node attributes?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> : Lars Ellenberg
>>>> : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability
>>>> : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com
>>>>
>>>> DRBD® and LINBIT® are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>
>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker