[Pacemaker] When a resource starts all at once in environment using utilization, score may not work

[Andrew Beekhof]

2011/8/18 Yuusuke IIDA <iidayuus at intellilink.co.jp>:
> Hi, Yan
> Hi, Andrew
>
> I started service by the following setting all at once.
> However, the placement of the resource was not carried out as expected.
>
> * By a function of utilization, I confine the resource that can start in each
> node to only one.
> * It is real rsc_location and the image as follows.
> =========================================================================
> location rsc_location-grpPostgreSQLDB1 grpPostgreSQLDB1 \
>        rule $id="rsc_location-grpPostgreSQLDB1-rule" 200: #uname eq act1
> location rsc_location-grpPostgreSQLDB2 grpPostgreSQLDB2 \
>        rule $id="rsc_location-grpPostgreSQLDB2-rule" 200: #uname eq act2
> location rsc_location-grpPostgreSQLDB3 grpPostgreSQLDB3 \
>        rule $id="rsc_location-grpPostgreSQLDB3-rule" 200: #uname eq act3
> location cli-prefer-grpPostgreSQLDB3 grpPostgreSQLDB3 \
>        rule $id="cli-prefer-rule-grpPostgreSQLDB3" inf: #uname eq act1
> =========================================================================
> _________________________________________________________
> ////|grpPostgreSQLDB1|grpPostgreSQLDB2  |grpPostgreSQLDB3
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> act1|200             |0                 |INFINITY
> act2|0               |200               |0
> act3|0               |0                 |200
> sby1|0               |0                 |0
> sby2|0               |0                 |0
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> * The placement of the resource that I expected is as follows.
> grpPostgreSQLDB1: act3
> grpPostgreSQLDB2: act2
> grpPostgreSQLDB3: act1
>
> * The placement carried out is really as follows.
> grpPostgreSQLDB1: act2
> grpPostgreSQLDB2: act3
> grpPostgreSQLDB3: act1
>
> Because I carried out "crm resource move grpPostgreSQLDB3 act1", the thing that
> grpPostgreSQLDB3 starts in act1 does not have any problem.
> Why did not grpPostgreSQLDB2 which had the highest score in act2 start?
> Is this movement revised as a bug?

Certainly looks like it.  Yan?

>
> Best Regards,
> Yuusuke
> --
> ----------------------------------------
> METRO SYSTEMS CO., LTD
>
> Yuusuke Iida
> Mail: iidayuus at intellilink.co.jp
> ----------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>
>