[Pacemaker] Do We Really Have to Put Everything on one Machine?
Nick Khamis
symack at gmail.com
Fri Sep 16 01:15:10 UTC 2011
Most examples show everything going on one server (glue, resources,
corosync, openais, pacemaker, mysql) Is it possible to split things up
into differernt servers?
For example
servers: pace1.example.com & pace2.example.com:
cluster glue, resourources agents, pacemaker
server: mydrbd1.example.com & mydrbd2.example.com
corosync, openais, and mysql
And still have pace1&2 perform things like:
* Mounting /dev/drbd0 in the event of a failure
* Load balance between nodes using ldirectord (not in the case of
mysql but other)
There should be no reason why we need to install ldirectord, and
resource agents on all the nodes?
Thanks in Advance,
Nick.
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list