[Pacemaker] Patch for bugzilla 2541: Shell should warn if parameter uniqueness is violated

[Bob Haxo]

All,

I'm seeing a problem referred to in this thread:

crm(live)configure# primitive stonith-ipmi-1 stonith:external/ipmi \
> meta target-role="started" is-managed="true" \
> operations $id="stonith-ipmi-1-operations" \
> op monitor interval="15" timeout="15" on-fail="restart" start-delay="15" \
> op start interval="0" timeout="15" on-fail="restart" \
> params hostname="r1lead2-bmc" ipaddr="172.24.0.10" userid="XXXXX" passwd="XXXXX" passwd_method="param" interface="lanplus"

crm(live)configure# commit

crm(live)configure# primitive stonith-ipmi-2 stonith:external/ipmi \
> meta target-role="started" is-managed="true" \
> operations $id="stonith-ipmi-2-operations" \
> op monitor interval="15" timeout="15" on-fail="restart" start-delay="15" \
> op start interval="0" timeout="15" on-fail="restart" \
> params hostname="r1lead1-bmc" ipaddr="172.24.0.7" userid="XXXXX" passwd="XXXXX" passwd_method="param" interface="lanplus"

crm(live)configure# commit
WARNING: Resources stonith-ipmi-1,stonith-ipmi-2 violate uniqueness for parameter "passwd": "XXXXX"
WARNING: Resources stonith-ipmi-1,stonith-ipmi-2 violate uniqueness for parameter "passwd_method": "param"
WARNING: Resources stonith-ipmi-1,stonith-ipmi-2 violate uniqueness for parameter "interface": "lanplus"
WARNING: Resources stonith-ipmi-1,stonith-ipmi-2 violate uniqueness for parameter "userid": "XXXXX"
Do you still want to commit? yes
crm(live)configure#

The problem is that I want to perform this operation as "crm <
commands", which returns the warnings and assumes a "NO" to the
question.

I have current Novell updates applied, which includes the cibconfig.py
d0472a26eda1 patch. I see no Novell bug for this issue.

Have I missed the fix under a different thread?

Any suggestions will be appreciated.  Thanks.

Bob Haxo










On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 10:33 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
> <bubble at hoster-ok.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 29.03.2011 18:33, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 08:41:45AM +0200, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> >>> Oops, this is actually a bug in fence_ipmilan which reports all params
> >>> as unique.
> >>
> >> Well, that's bad, but then we don't want to annoy people until
> >> this issue has been resolved. The meta-data stuff usually needs
> >> a bit more attention, as far as I could see. I think that we'd
> >> need to make this check optional.
> >
> > I planned to post patch to redhat's bugzilla in nearest days (together
> > with bunch of other fixes and features). Should I send it (them)
> > somewhere else too?
> 
> Nah, RHBZ should be enough.
> 
> >
> >>
> >> What's your experience? Does it show these messages only once or
> >> all the time?
> >
> > Only once after resource either defined or changed.
> > It also cries something about start and stop operations, do not remember
> > now, sorry, short on time right now.
> >
> >
> > Vladislav
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> >
> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> > Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker