[Pacemaker] [Problem]post_notify_start_0 is carried out in the node that disappeared.
renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp
renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp
Fri Feb 18 09:12:40 UTC 2011
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comment.
> > If you need detailed information, give me communication.
>
> Should be enough in the bug, i'll follow up there
All right.
Thanks!
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Tue, 2011/2/15, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:01 PM, <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp> wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > Thank you for comment.
> >
> >> Perhaps I misunderstood - does the node fail _while_ we're running post_notify_start_0?
> >> Is that the ordering you're talking about?
> >
> > Yes.
> > I think that stonith do not have to wait for post_notify_start_0 of the inoperative node.
> >
> >> If so, then the crmd is already supposed to be smart enough not to bother waiting for those actions - perhaps the logic got broken at some point.
> >
> > If you need detailed information, give me communication.
>
> Should be enough in the bug, i'll follow up there
>
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list