[Pacemaker] [Problem]post_notify_start_0 is carried out in the node that disappeared.

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:01 PM,  <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thank you for comment.
>
>> Perhaps I misunderstood - does the node fail _while_ we're running post_notify_start_0?
>> Is that the ordering you're talking about?
>
> Yes.
> I think that stonith do not have to wait for post_notify_start_0 of the inoperative node.
>
>> If so, then the crmd is already supposed to be smart enough not to bother waiting for those actions - perhaps the logic got broken at some point.
>
> If you need detailed information, give me communication.

Should be enough in the bug, i'll follow up there