[Pacemaker] Upgrading from 1.0 to 1.1

[Andrew Beekhof]

Nothing looks wrong from the logs.  I also tried it with the latest
code in devel and it worked fine.

stop corosync
s/ver:0/ver:1/ in corosync.conf
start corosync
start pacemaker


On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Kiril Proskurin
<k.proskurin at corp.mail.ru> wrote:
> 29 июля 2011, 04:34 от Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Proskurin Kirill
> <k.proskurin at corp.mail.ru> wrote:
>> 27.07.2011 5:56, Andrew Beekhof пишет:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Proskurin Kirill
>>> <k.proskurin at corp.mail.ru>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 07/19/2011 03:22 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Proskurin Kirill
>>>>> <k.proskurin at corp.mail.ru>    wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I found what I using corosync with pacemaker "ver:0" with installed
>>>>>> pacemaker 1.1.5 - eg without start a pacemakerd.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sounds wrong. :-)
>>>>>> So I try to upgrade.
>>>>>> I shutdown one node. Change 0 to 1 on service.d/pcmk
>>>>>> Start corosync and then start pacemakerd via init script.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But this node stays online and on clusters DC I see:
>>>>>> cib: [18392]: WARN: cib_peer_callback: Discarding cib_sync_one message
>>>>>> (255)
>>>>>> from mysender10.example.com: not in our membership
>>>>>
>>>>> Thats odd.  The only you changed was ver: 0 to ver: 1 ?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, only this. To make it more clear - I have 4 nodes with ver 0 and
>>>> try
>>>> to
>>>> add one with ver 1 and got this.
>>>>
>>>> Well I shutdown all nodes change all to 1 and star them up add all was
>>>> ok.
>>>> Not a really good way to upgrade but I don`t have time.
>>>
>>> Do you still have the logs for the failure case?
>>> I'd really like to see them.
>>
>> No I don`t. But some time ago I got same error on vise-versa situation -
>> then I try to add node with "ver: 0" to cluster there all nodes are "ver:
>> 1"
>>
>> Anyway my cluster are down now so I can do some test. I will sent logs to
>> maillist if I reproduce this situation again.
>
> excellent
>
> I already try it with 3 node test cluster.
> I try 2 nodes with ver:1 and one with ver:0 - ver:0 stays offline.
> And i try vise-versa - 2 with ver:0 and 1 with ver:1 - ver:1 stays offline
> I post this on #linix-cluster IRC and check it with danfrincu.
>
> Hm, ok I have some time before production start and make test again to send
> you logs.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Proskurin Kirill
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs:
> http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>
>