[Pacemaker] pacemaker version

[Pavlos Parissis]

On 8 October 2010 09:28, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Pavlos Parissis
> <pavlos.parissis at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 8 October 2010 07:47, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Pavlos Parissis
>>> <pavlos.parissis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 7 October 2010 08:33, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
>>>>> <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Shravan Mishra <shravan.mishra at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >> That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this question.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On June, inside a complex thread regarding "colocation -inf", Andrew
>>>>> > reported the link and also several clarifications after some questions
>>>>> > of mine...
>>>>> >
>>>>> > See in particular:
>>>>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006606.html
>>>>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006610.html
>>>>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006620.html
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I think they are still valid...
>>>>>
>>>>> Absolutely.  These will all be valid until 1.2 comes out (and then
>>>>> they'll apply to 1.3 instead :-)
>>>>
>>>> I am a bit confused about the meaning of pacemaker-1.0,1.1 and 1.2
>>>> schema, mentioned here
>>>> http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/441442543/new-pacemaker-release-series
>>>>
>>>> Let's I have installed 1.1 how do I know if I use pacemaker-1.o or 1.2 schema?
>>>> Sorry if it sounds stupid but I simple don't understand it
>>>
>>> cibadmin -Ql | grep validate
>>>
>>
>>
>> [root at node-01 ~]# cibadmin -Ql | grep validate
>> <cib validate-with="pacemaker-1.0" crm_feature_set="3.0.1"
>> have-quorum="1" dc-uuid="b7764e7b-0a00-4745-8d9e-6911271eefb2"
>> admin_epoch="0" epoch="271" num_updates="3">
>>
>> since validate-with is set to pacemaker-1.0, I am using pacemaker-1.0
>> schema, right?
>
> Right.
>
>> So, if I upgrade to 1.1.3 and leave validate-with to pacemaker-1.0, I
>> will run a stable 1.1.3, but if I set to pacemaker-1.1 I will be
>> running a "testing|unstable" 1.1.3.
>
> You'll be enabling some unfinished features.
>
>> Have I understood it correctly?
>
> Essentially, yes.

thanks