[Pacemaker] pacemaker version

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Pavlos Parissis
<pavlos.parissis at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8 October 2010 07:47, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Pavlos Parissis
>> <pavlos.parissis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 7 October 2010 08:33, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
>>>> <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Shravan Mishra <shravan.mishra at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this question.
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> > On June, inside a complex thread regarding "colocation -inf", Andrew
>>>> > reported the link and also several clarifications after some questions
>>>> > of mine...
>>>> >
>>>> > See in particular:
>>>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006606.html
>>>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006610.html
>>>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006620.html
>>>> >
>>>> > I think they are still valid...
>>>>
>>>> Absolutely.  These will all be valid until 1.2 comes out (and then
>>>> they'll apply to 1.3 instead :-)
>>>
>>> I am a bit confused about the meaning of pacemaker-1.0,1.1 and 1.2
>>> schema, mentioned here
>>> http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/441442543/new-pacemaker-release-series
>>>
>>> Let's I have installed 1.1 how do I know if I use pacemaker-1.o or 1.2 schema?
>>> Sorry if it sounds stupid but I simple don't understand it
>>
>> cibadmin -Ql | grep validate
>>
>
>
> [root at node-01 ~]# cibadmin -Ql | grep validate
> <cib validate-with="pacemaker-1.0" crm_feature_set="3.0.1"
> have-quorum="1" dc-uuid="b7764e7b-0a00-4745-8d9e-6911271eefb2"
> admin_epoch="0" epoch="271" num_updates="3">
>
> since validate-with is set to pacemaker-1.0, I am using pacemaker-1.0
> schema, right?

Right.

> So, if I upgrade to 1.1.3 and leave validate-with to pacemaker-1.0, I
> will run a stable 1.1.3, but if I set to pacemaker-1.1 I will be
> running a "testing|unstable" 1.1.3.

You'll be enabling some unfinished features.

> Have I understood it correctly?

Essentially, yes.