[Pacemaker] Project updates

[Pavlos Parissis]

On 18 November 2010 13:38, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Keisuke MORI <keisuke.mori+ha at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>>>>>> For those that aren't using RSS readers, I wanted to draw people's
>>>>>> attention to a couple of updates that went out today.
>>>
>>> Congratulations for the 1.0.10 release!
>>> It is the great excitement for us too,
>>> but one thing I would like to comment...
>>>
>>>
>>> 2010/11/13 Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Vadym Chepkov <vchepkov at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>  STABLE_SERIES          = stable-1.0
>>>>>
>>>>>  RPM_ROOT       = $(shell pwd)
>>>>> diff -r 99f5a1e61667 configure.ac
>>>>> --- a/configure.ac      Fri Nov 12 09:12:32 2010 +0100
>>>>> +++ b/configure.ac      Fri Nov 12 11:47:28 2010 -0500
>>>>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>>>>>  dnl     checks for library functions
>>>>>  dnl     checks for system services
>>>>>
>>>>> -AC_INIT(pacemaker, 1.0.9, pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org)
>>>>> +AC_INIT(pacemaker, 1.0.10, pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org)
>>>>
>>>> thats kinda annoying but not crucial.  thanks for pointing it out
>>>>
>>>
>>> This would be confusing for users to tell which version they're
>>> actually using when they are going to report a problem because all the
>>> logs and crm_mon output shows the version as "1.0.9".
>>>
>>> Any chance of the release for another RPMs with this fix?
>>
>> Oh, I forgot about crm_mon.
>> I'll see what I can do.
>>
>
> Happily a change to the spec file is all that was needed.
> New rpms should be available for all platforms
>
>

Cool, I am going to try out by doing a fresh installation on my 3-node
clusters. I am also going to check if the issues I have found so far
with 1.0.9 are solved with 1.0.10.

Thanks,
Pavlos