[Pacemaker] Project updates

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Keisuke MORI <keisuke.mori+ha at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>>>>> For those that aren't using RSS readers, I wanted to draw people's
>>>>> attention to a couple of updates that went out today.
>>
>> Congratulations for the 1.0.10 release!
>> It is the great excitement for us too,
>> but one thing I would like to comment...
>>
>>
>> 2010/11/13 Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Vadym Chepkov <vchepkov at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>
>>>>  STABLE_SERIES          = stable-1.0
>>>>
>>>>  RPM_ROOT       = $(shell pwd)
>>>> diff -r 99f5a1e61667 configure.ac
>>>> --- a/configure.ac      Fri Nov 12 09:12:32 2010 +0100
>>>> +++ b/configure.ac      Fri Nov 12 11:47:28 2010 -0500
>>>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>>>>  dnl     checks for library functions
>>>>  dnl     checks for system services
>>>>
>>>> -AC_INIT(pacemaker, 1.0.9, pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org)
>>>> +AC_INIT(pacemaker, 1.0.10, pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org)
>>>
>>> thats kinda annoying but not crucial.  thanks for pointing it out
>>>
>>
>> This would be confusing for users to tell which version they're
>> actually using when they are going to report a problem because all the
>> logs and crm_mon output shows the version as "1.0.9".
>>
>> Any chance of the release for another RPMs with this fix?
>
> Oh, I forgot about crm_mon.
> I'll see what I can do.
>

Happily a change to the spec file is all that was needed.
New rpms should be available for all platforms