[Pacemaker] Shouldn't colocation -inf: be mandatory?

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Thu Jun 17 08:06:47 EDT 2010


On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <dejanmm at fastmail.fm> wrote:
> I don't know what do you want. This was just about how to produce
> two adjacent sequential resource sets.

nothing says that two is the maximum btw.

you could easily have [ a b c ] ( d e f ) [ g h i ]




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list