[Pacemaker] the better class plugin for a service?

Ivan Coronado icoronado at epcge.com
Mon Apr 19 09:57:40 EDT 2010


Thanks for the answer. 


 
Ivan 


-----Mensaje original-----
De: Dejan Muhamedagic [mailto:dejanmm at fastmail.fm] 
Enviado el: lunes, 19 de abril de 2010 13:26
Para: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Asunto: Re: [Pacemaker] the better class plugin for a service?

Hi,

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 06:01:17PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Ivan Coronado <icoronado at epcge.com>
wrote:
> > And why is a better choice? How I can know?
> 
> The OCF standard is better in many ways, including its support for 
> parameters and the error codes it returns.

LSB class is normal init scripts which may not be very robust.
The OCF class agents were designed and implemented for use in clusters.

Thanks,

Dejan

> The pacemaker docs include a section on each of the supported resource
classes.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org 
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: 
> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started:
http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list