[Pacemaker] RFC: How do you upgrade?

[Andrew Beekhof]

On May 7, 2008, at 3:08 PM, Pinto, Phil (GTS) wrote:

> Dominik,
>
> Does option 3 cause HB to recycle the resources when you re-attach  
> them?

nope - that would defeat the point :-)

>  If not this approach would be better than what I'm doing using a  
> rolling upgrade with one fail-over - if the resource can stay up  
> throughout upgrade process.
>
>
>
> Thanks...
>
> Phil Pinto
> _______________________________________________
>
> Work Phone:	267-580-3360
> Cell Phone:	917-841-0422
> SMS: 		9178410422 at vtext.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pacemaker-bounces at clusterlabs.org [mailto:pacemaker-bounces at clusterlabs.org 
> ] On Behalf Of Dominik Klein
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 3:02 AM
> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] RFC: How do you upgrade?
>
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> Me again,
>>
>> I'd like to get a sense of how people upgrade their clusters...
>>
>> * rolling upgrade (node-by-node)
>> * big-bang (all nodes at once with all resources stopped)
>> * detach and reattach (all nodes at once with resources still  
>> running)
>> * other?
>>
>> I'm interested to know how popular the various methods are.
>>
>> Andrew
>
> I prefer no. 3 (detach and reattach).
>
> Works quite nicely.
>
> Regards
> Dominik
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker at clusterlabs.org
> http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> This message w/attachments (message) may be privileged, confidential  
> or proprietary, and if you are not an intended recipient, please  
> notify the sender, do not use or share it and delete it. Unless  
> specifically indicated, this message is not an offer to sell or a  
> solicitation of any investment products or other financial product  
> or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an  
> official statement of Merrill Lynch. Subject to applicable law,  
> Merrill Lynch may monitor, review and retain e-communications (EC)  
> traveling through its networks/systems. The laws of the country of  
> each sender/recipient may impact the handling of EC, and EC may be  
> archived, supervised and produced in countries other than the  
> country in which you are located. This message cannot be guaranteed  
> to be secure or error-free. This message is subject to terms  
> available at the following link: http://www.ml.com/e-communications_terms/ 
> . By messaging with Merrill Lynch you consent to the foregoing.
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker at clusterlabs.org
> http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker