[ClusterLabs] Possible idea for 2.0.0: renaming the Pacemaker daemons

Jan Pokorný jpokorny at redhat.com
Wed Apr 11 13:00:40 EDT 2018

On 11/04/18 15:24 +0200, Klaus Wenninger wrote:
> On 04/11/2018 01:14 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> you know... I wouldn't be opposed to running two copies (one for
>> config, one for status) and having the crmd combine the two before
>> sending to the PE.  i've toyed with the idea in the past to
>> alleviate some of the performance issues
> And maybe even a 3rd one for attributes/key-storage - picking up the
> idea floating around in this thread as well.

Sounds like -datahubd would rhyme with all of these,
split covered with -confhubd and -statushubd, plus,
for instance, -dicthubd :-)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180411/4c908794/attachment-0002.sig>

More information about the Users mailing list