[Pacemaker] pacemaker-remote location constraint
David Vossel
dvossel at redhat.com
Tue Sep 9 17:56:31 UTC 2014
----- Original Message -----
> Is it possible to put a location constraint on a resource such that it will
> only run on a pacemaker-remote node? Or vice-versa, so that a resource will
> not run on a pacemaker-remote node?
>
> At a glance, this doesn't seem possible as the pacemaker-remote node does not
> exist as a <node> entry in the CIB, so there's nothing to match on. Is it
> possible to match on the absence of that <node> entry?
>
> The only other way I can think of doing this is to set utilization
> attributes, such that the remote nodes provide a "remote" utilization
> attribute, and configure the resource such that it needs 1 unit of "remote".
There is definitely a way to do this already. I can't remember how though.
Andrew, I know we discussed this a few months ago and you immediately rattled
off how we allow this. Do you remember?
-- Vossel
> -Patrick
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list