[Pacemaker] MySQL, Percona replication manager - split brain

Andrei Borzenkov arvidjaar at gmail.com
Sun Oct 26 15:44:37 UTC 2014


В Sun, 26 Oct 2014 10:51:13 +0200
Andrew <nitr0 at seti.kr.ua> пишет:

> 26.10.2014 08:32, Andrei Borzenkov пишет:
> > В Sat, 25 Oct 2014 23:34:54 +0300
> > Andrew <nitr0 at seti.kr.ua> пишет:
> >
> >> 25.10.2014 22:34, Digimer пишет:
> >>> On 25/10/14 03:32 PM, Andrew wrote:
> >>>> Hi all.
> >>>>
> >>>> I use Percona as RA on cluster (nothing mission-critical, currently -
> >>>> just zabbix data); today after restarting MySQL resource (crm resource
> >>>> restart p_mysql) I've got a split brain state - MySQL for some reason
> >>>> started first at ex-slave node, ex-master starts later (possibly I've
> >>>> set too small timeout to shutdown - only 120s, but I'm not sure).
> >>>>

Your logs do not show resource restart - they show pacemaker restart on
node2.

> >>>> After restart resource on both nodes it seems like mysql replication was
> >>>> ok - but then after ~50min it fails in split brain again for unknown
> >>>> reason (no resource restart was noticed).
> >>>>
> >>>> In 'show replication status' there is an error in table caused by unique
> >>>> index dup.
> >>>>
> >>>> So I have a questions:
> >>>> 1) Which thing causes split brain, and how to avoid it in future?
> >>> Cause:
> >>>
> >>> Logs?
> >> ct 25 13:54:13 node2 crmd[29248]:   notice: do_state_transition: State
> >> transition S_IDLE -> S_POLICY_ENGINE [ input=I_PE_CALC
> >> cause=C_FSA_INTERNAL origin=abort_transition_graph ]
> >> Oct 25 13:54:13 node2 pengine[29247]:   notice: unpack_config: On loss
> >> of CCM Quorum: Ignore
> >> Oct 25 13:54:13 node2 pengine[29247]:   notice: unpack_rsc_op: Operation
> >> monitor found resource p_pgsql:0 active in master mode on node1.cluster
> >> Oct 25 13:54:13 node2 pengine[29247]:   notice: unpack_rsc_op: Operation
> >> monitor found resource p_mysql:1 active in master mode on node2.cluster
> > That seems too late. The real cause is that resource was reported as
> > being in master state on both nodes and this happened earlier.
> This is a different resources (pgsql and mysql)/
> 
> >>> Prevent:
> >>>
> >>> Fencing (aka stonith). This is why fencing is required.
> >> No node failure. Just daemon was restarted.
> >>
> > "Split brain" == loss of communication. It does not matter whether
> > communication was lost because node failed or because daemon was not
> > running. There is no way for surviving node to know, *why*
> > communication was lost.
> >
> So how stonith will help in this case? Daemon will be restarted after 
> it's death if it occures during restart, and stonith will see alive 
> daemon...
> 
> So what is the easiest split-brain solution? Just to stop daemons, and 
> copy all mysql data from good node to bad one?

There is no split-brain visible in your log. Pacemaker on node2 was
restarted, cleanly as far as I can tell, and reintegrated back in
cluster. May be node1 "lost" node2, but that needs logs from node1.

You probably misuse "split brain" in this case. Split-brain means -
nodes lost communication with each other, so each node is unaware of
in which state resources on other node are. Here "nodes" means
corosync/pacemaker. Not individual resources.




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list