[Pacemaker] Raid RA Changes to Enable ms configuration -- need some assistance plz.

[Andrew Beekhof]

> On 17 Oct 2014, at 9:53 am, Errol Neal <eneal at businessgrade.com> wrote:
> 
> Andrew Beekhof <andrew at ...> writes:
> 
>> 
>> Yes. If you want the cluster to start things in a particular order, 
> then you need to specify it.
> 
> Andrew, but my issue isn't getting the resources to start in a a 
> specific order. My issue is that I can't get the slave resource to get 
> promoted when the previous master goes offline. 

Ok. I was responding to "My understanding is that in order for N to start, N+1 must already be running."

Is your RA using crm_master to indicate a preference for being promoted on both nodes?

It could also be that newer versions have gotten smarter about how to handle the situation.