[Pacemaker] #kind eq container matches bare-metal nodes

[Andrew Beekhof]

> On 20 Oct 2014, at 8:52 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov <bubble at hoster-ok.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Andrew, David, all,
> 
> It seems like #kind was introduced before bare-metal remote node
> support, and now it is matched against "cluster" and "container".
> Bare-metal remote nodes match "container" (they are remote), but
> strictly speaking they are not containers.
> Could/should that attribute be extended to the bare-metal use case?

Unclear, the intent was 'nodes that aren't really cluster nodes'.
Whats the usecase for wanting to tell them apart? (I can think of some, just want to hear yours)