[Pacemaker] Fencing of movable VirtualDomains

[Daniel Dehennin]

Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> writes:

>> Maybe not, the collocation should be sufficient, but even without the
>> orders, unclean VMs fencing is tried with other Stonith devices.
>
> Which other devices?  The config you sent through didnt have any
> others.

Sorry I sent it to linux-cluster mailing-list but not here, I attach it.

>> I'll switch to newer corosync/pacemaker and use the pacemaker_remote if
>> I can manage dlm/cLVM/OCFS2 with it.
>
> No can do.  All three services require corosync on the node. 

Ok, so the remote is useless in my case, but upgrading seems required[1]
in my case since wheezy software stack looks to old.

Thanks.

Footnotes: 
[1]  http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.cluster/22963

-- 
Daniel Dehennin
Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF
Fingerprint: 3E69 014E 5C23 50E8 9ED6  2AAD CC1E 9E5B 7A6F E2DF

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: pcmk.conf
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20141007/bf4d08ef/attachment-0002.conf>