[Pacemaker] Long failover

Andrei Borzenkov arvidjaar at gmail.com
Mon Nov 17 07:17:10 UTC 2014


On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>
>> On 14 Nov 2014, at 10:57 pm, Dmitry Matveichev <d.matveichev at mfisoft.ru> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We have a cluster configured via pacemaker+corosync+crm. The configuration is:
>>
>> node master
>> node slave
>> primitive HA-VIP1 IPaddr2 \
>>         params ip=192.168.22.71 nic=bond0 \
>>         op monitor interval=1s
>> primitive HA-variator lsb: variator \
>>         op monitor interval=1s \
>>         meta migration-threshold=1 failure-timeout=1s
>> group HA-Group HA-VIP1 HA-variator
>> property cib-bootstrap-options: \
>>         dc-version=1.1.10-14.el6-368c726 \
>>         cluster-infrastructure="classic openais (with plugin)" \
>
> General advice, don't use the plugin. See:
>
> http://blog.clusterlabs.org/blog/2013/pacemaker-and-rhel-6-dot-4/
> http://blog.clusterlabs.org/blog/2013/pacemaker-on-rhel6-dot-4/
>
>>         expected-quorum-votes=2 \
>>         stonith-enabled=false \
>>        no-quorum-policy=ignore \
>>         last-lrm-refresh=1383871087
>> rsc_defaults rsc-options: \
>>         resource-stickiness=100
>>
>> Firstly I make the variator service down  on the master node (actually I delete the service binary and kill the variator process, so the variator fails to restart). Resources very quickly move on the slave node as expected. Then I return the binary on the master and restart the variator service. Now I make the same stuff with binary and service on slave node. The crm status command quickly shows me HA-variator   (lsb: variator):        Stopped. But it take to much time (for us) before recourses are switched on the master node (around 1 min).
>
> I see what you mean:
>
> 2013-12-21T07:04:12.230827+04:00 master crmd[14267]:   notice: te_rsc_command: Initiating action 2: monitor HA-variator_monitor_1000 on slave.mfisoft.ru
> 2013-12-21T05:45:09+04:00 slave crmd[7086]:   notice: process_lrm_event: slave.mfisoft.ru-HA-variator_monitor_1000:106 [ variator.x is stopped\n ]
>
> (1 minute goes by)
>
> 2013-12-21T07:05:14.232029+04:00 master crmd[14267]:    error: print_synapse: [Action    2]: In-flight rsc op HA-variator_monitor_1000 on slave.mfisoft.ru (priority: 0, waiting: none)
> 2013-12-21T07:05:14.232102+04:00 master crmd[14267]:  warning: cib_action_update: rsc_op 2: HA-variator_monitor_1000 on slave.mfisoft.ru timed out
>

Is it possible that pacemaker is confused by time difference on master
and slave?

> Is there a corosync log file configured?  That would have more detail on slave.
>
>> Then line
>> Failed actions:
>>     HA- variator _monitor_1000 on slave 'unknown error' (1): call=-1, status=Timed Out, last-rc-change='Sat Dec 21 03:59:45 2013', queued=0ms, exec=0ms
>> appears in the crm status and recourses are switched.
>>
>> What is that timeout? Where I can change it?
>>
>> ------------------------
>> Kind regards,
>> Dmitriy Matveichev.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>
>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list