[Pacemaker] What is the reason which the node in which failure has not occurred carries out "lost"?
Andrew Beekhof
andrew at beekhof.net
Tue Mar 18 00:56:33 UTC 2014
On 12 Mar 2014, at 1:45 pm, Yusuke Iida <yusk.iida at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Andrew
> 2014-03-12 6:37 GMT+09:00 Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>> Mar 07 13:24:14 [2528] vm01 crmd: (te_callbacks:493 ) error:
>>> te_update_diff: Ingoring create operation for /cib 0xf91c10,
>>> configuration
>>
>> Thats interesting... is that with the fixes mentioned above?
> I'm sorry.
> The above-mentioned log is not outputted by the newest Pacemaker.
> The following logs come out in the newest thing.
>
> Mar 12 10:43:38 [6124] vm02 crmd: (te_callbacks:377 ) trace:
> te_update_diff: Handling create operation for /cib/configuration
> 0x1c37c60, fencing-topology
> Mar 12 10:43:38 [6124] vm02 crmd: (te_callbacks:493 ) error:
> te_update_diff: Ingoring create operation for /cib/configuration
> 0x1c37c60, fencing-topology
> Mar 12 10:43:38 [6124] vm02 crmd: (te_callbacks:377 ) trace:
> te_update_diff: Handling create operation for /cib/configuration
> 0x1c397a0, rsc_defaults
> Mar 12 10:43:38 [6124] vm02 crmd: (te_callbacks:493 ) error:
> te_update_diff: Ingoring create operation for /cib/configuration
> 0x1c397a0, rsc_defaults
>
> I checked code of te_update_diff.
> Should not the next judgment be changed if change of fencing-topology
> or rsc_defaults is processed as a configuration subordinate's change?
Perfect!
https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/1c285ac
Thanks to everyone for giving the new CIB a pounding, we should be in very good shape for a release soon :-)
>
> diff --git a/crmd/te_callbacks.c b/crmd/te_callbacks.c
> index dd57660..f97bab5 100644
> --- a/crmd/te_callbacks.c
> +++ b/crmd/te_callbacks.c
> @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ te_update_diff(const char *event, xmlNode * msg)
> if(xpath == NULL) {
> /* Version field, ignore */
>
> - } else if(strstr(xpath, "/cib/configuration/")) {
> + } else if(strstr(xpath, "/cib/configuration")) {
> abort_transition(INFINITY, tg_restart, "Non-status
> change", change);
>
> } else if(strstr(xpath, "/"XML_CIB_TAG_TICKETS"[") ||
> safe_str_eq(name, XML_CIB_TAG_TICKETS)) {
>
> How is such change?
>
> I attach report at this time.
> The trace log of te_update_diff is also contained.
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwMFJItoO-fVeVVEemVsZVBoUWc/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Regards,
> Yusuke
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> but it looks like crmsh is doing something funny with its updates... does anyone know what command it is running?
>>>
>>> The execution result of the following commands remained in /var/log/messages.
>>>
>>> Mar 7 13:24:14 vm01 cibadmin[2555]: notice: crm_log_args: Invoked:
>>> cibadmin -p -R --force
>>
>> I'm somewhat confused at this point.... if crmsh is using --replace, then why is it doing diff calculations?
>> Or are replace operations only for the load operation?
>
>
>
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------
> METRO SYSTEMS CO., LTD
>
> Yusuke Iida
> Mail: yusk.iida at gmail.com
> ----------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20140318/d922e7b4/attachment-0004.sig>
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list