[Pacemaker] votequorum for 2 node cluster

[Andrew Beekhof]

Chrissy?  Can you shed some light here?

On 11 Jun 2014, at 11:26 pm, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko <konstantin.ponomarenko at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi guys,
> 
> I am trying to deal somehow with split brain situation in 2 node cluster using votequorum.
> Here is a quorum section in my corosync.conf:
> 
> provider: corosync_votequorum
> expected_votes: 2
> wait_for_all: 1
> last_man_standing: 1
> auto_tie_breaker: 1
> 
> My question is about behavior of the remaining node after I shout down node with the lowest nodeid.
> My expectation is that after a last_man_standing_window this node should be back working.
> 
> Or in the case of two node cluster it is not a solution?
> 
> Thank you,
> Kostya
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20140612/717fddfa/attachment-0004.sig>