[Pacemaker] The problem with which queue between cib and stonith-ng overflows

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Wed Jun 4 05:34:58 UTC 2014 

On 4 Jun 2014, at 1:57 pm, Yusuke Iida <yusk.iida at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, Andrew
> 
> I tested, where a patch is applied to the newest of 1.1 brunches.
> metadata of fence_legacy came to be performed only once.
> The time concerning device information construction was shortened at
> about 2 seconds.
> Therefore, the problem is solved.
> It was satisfactory although the composition of 16 nodes was also checked.
> 
> I want this correction to be included in 1.1.12.

Done: https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/d924912

Thanks for testing!

> 
> Thanks,
> Yusuke
> 
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info:
> update_fencing_topology: Re-initializing fencing topology after
> top-level create operation
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info: stonith_level_remove:
> Node vm01 not found (0 active entries)
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info:
> stonith_level_register: Node vm01 has 1 active fencing levels
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info:
> stonith_level_register: Node vm01 has 2 active fencing levels
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info: stonith_level_remove:
> Node vm02 not found (1 active entries)
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info:
> stonith_level_register: Node vm02 has 1 active fencing levels
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info:
> stonith_level_register: Node vm02 has 2 active fencing levels
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info: stonith_level_remove:
> Node vm03 not found (2 active entries)
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info:
> stonith_level_register: Node vm03 has 1 active fencing levels
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info:
> stonith_level_register: Node vm03 has 2 active fencing levels
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info: stonith_level_remove:
> Node vm04 not found (3 active entries)
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info:
> stonith_level_register: Node vm04 has 1 active fencing levels
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info:
> stonith_level_register: Node vm04 has 2 active fencing levels
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info: stonith_level_remove:
> Node vm05 not found (4 active entries)
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info:
> stonith_level_register: Node vm05 has 1 active fencing levels
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info:
> stonith_level_register: Node vm05 has 2 active fencing levels
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info: stonith_level_remove:
> Node vm06 not found (5 active entries)
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info:
> stonith_level_register: Node vm06 has 1 active fencing levels
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info:
> stonith_level_register: Node vm06 has 2 active fencing levels
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info: stonith_level_remove:
> Node vm07 not found (6 active entries)
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info:
> stonith_level_register: Node vm07 has 1 active fencing levels
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info:
> stonith_level_register: Node vm07 has 2 active fencing levels
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info: stonith_level_remove:
> Node vm08 not found (7 active entries)
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info:
> stonith_level_register: Node vm08 has 1 active fencing levels
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info:
> stonith_level_register: Node vm08 has 2 active fencing levels
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info:
> update_cib_stonith_devices_v2: Updating device list from the cib:
> create resources
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info: cib_devices_update:
> Updating devices to version 0.4.0
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:   notice: unpack_config: On
> loss of CCM Quorum: Ignore
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:  warning:
> handle_startup_fencing: Blind faith: not fencing unseen nodes
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:  warning:
> handle_startup_fencing: Blind faith: not fencing unseen nodes
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:  warning:
> handle_startup_fencing: Blind faith: not fencing unseen nodes
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:  warning:
> handle_startup_fencing: Blind faith: not fencing unseen nodes
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:  warning:
> handle_startup_fencing: Blind faith: not fencing unseen nodes
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:  warning:
> handle_startup_fencing: Blind faith: not fencing unseen nodes
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:  warning:
> handle_startup_fencing: Blind faith: not fencing unseen nodes
> Jun  4 10:47:08 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:  warning:
> handle_startup_fencing: Blind faith: not fencing unseen nodes
> Jun  4 10:47:09 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:   notice:
> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_helper01' to the device
> list (1 active devices)
> Jun  4 10:47:09 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:   notice:
> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_libvirt01' to the device
> list (2 active devices)
> Jun  4 10:47:09 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info: cib_device_update:
> Device prmStonith_helper02 has been disabled on vm02: score=-INFINITY
> Jun  4 10:47:09 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:     info: cib_device_update:
> Device prmStonith_libvirt02 has been disabled on vm02: score=-INFINITY
> Jun  4 10:47:09 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:   notice:
> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_helper03' to the device
> list (3 active devices)
> Jun  4 10:47:09 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:   notice:
> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_libvirt03' to the device
> list (4 active devices)
> Jun  4 10:47:09 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:   notice:
> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_helper04' to the device
> list (5 active devices)
> Jun  4 10:47:09 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:   notice:
> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_libvirt04' to the device
> list (6 active devices)
> Jun  4 10:47:09 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:   notice:
> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_helper05' to the device
> list (7 active devices)
> Jun  4 10:47:09 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:   notice:
> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_libvirt05' to the device
> list (8 active devices)
> Jun  4 10:47:09 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:   notice:
> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_helper06' to the device
> list (9 active devices)
> Jun  4 10:47:09 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:   notice:
> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_libvirt06' to the device
> list (10 active devices)
> Jun  4 10:47:09 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:   notice:
> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_helper07' to the device
> list (11 active devices)
> Jun  4 10:47:09 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:   notice:
> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_libvirt07' to the device
> list (12 active devices)
> Jun  4 10:47:09 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:   notice:
> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_helper08' to the device
> list (13 active devices)
> Jun  4 10:47:09 vm02 stonith-ng[2971]:   notice:
> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_libvirt08' to the device
> list (14 active devices)
> 
> 2014-06-04 8:18 GMT+09:00 Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>> 
>> On 4 Jun 2014, at 8:11 am, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On 3 Jun 2014, at 11:26 am, Yusuke Iida <yusk.iida at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi, Andrew
>>>> 
>>>> About 15 seconds are the time taken in the whole device construction.
>>>> I think that it cannot receive the message from cib during device
>>>> construction since stonith-ng does not return to mainloop.
>>> 
>>> I'm reasonably sure this is because we do synchronous metadata calls when a device is added.
>>> I'll have a patch which creates a per-agent metadata cache (instead of per device) for you to test later today.
>> 
>> Can you try this please:
>> 
>>   http://paste.fedoraproject.org/106995/18374851
>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info: init_cib_cache_cb:
>>>> Updating device list from the cib: init
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info: stonith_level_remove:
>>>> Node vm01 not found (0 active entries)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info:
>>>> stonith_level_register: Node vm01 has 1 active fencing levels
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info:
>>>> stonith_level_register: Node vm01 has 2 active fencing levels
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info: stonith_level_remove:
>>>> Node vm02 not found (1 active entries)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info:
>>>> stonith_level_register: Node vm02 has 1 active fencing levels
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info:
>>>> stonith_level_register: Node vm02 has 2 active fencing levels
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info: stonith_level_remove:
>>>> Node vm03 not found (2 active entries)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info:
>>>> stonith_level_register: Node vm03 has 1 active fencing levels
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info:
>>>> stonith_level_register: Node vm03 has 2 active fencing levels
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info: stonith_level_remove:
>>>> Node vm04 not found (3 active entries)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info:
>>>> stonith_level_register: Node vm04 has 1 active fencing levels
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info:
>>>> stonith_level_register: Node vm04 has 2 active fencing levels
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info: stonith_level_remove:
>>>> Node vm05 not found (4 active entries)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info:
>>>> stonith_level_register: Node vm05 has 1 active fencing levels
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info:
>>>> stonith_level_register: Node vm05 has 2 active fencing levels
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info: stonith_level_remove:
>>>> Node vm06 not found (5 active entries)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info:
>>>> stonith_level_register: Node vm06 has 1 active fencing levels
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info:
>>>> stonith_level_register: Node vm06 has 2 active fencing levels
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info: stonith_level_remove:
>>>> Node vm07 not found (6 active entries)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info:
>>>> stonith_level_register: Node vm07 has 1 active fencing levels
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info:
>>>> stonith_level_register: Node vm07 has 2 active fencing levels
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info: stonith_level_remove:
>>>> Node vm08 not found (7 active entries)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info:
>>>> stonith_level_register: Node vm08 has 1 active fencing levels
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info:
>>>> stonith_level_register: Node vm08 has 2 active fencing levels
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info: cib_devices_update:
>>>> Updating devices to version 0.4.937
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:   notice: unpack_config: On
>>>> loss of CCM Quorum: Ignore
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:  warning:
>>>> handle_startup_fencing: Blind faith: not fencing unseen nodes
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:  warning:
>>>> handle_startup_fencing: Blind faith: not fencing unseen nodes
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:  warning:
>>>> handle_startup_fencing: Blind faith: not fencing unseen nodes
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:  warning:
>>>> handle_startup_fencing: Blind faith: not fencing unseen nodes
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:  warning:
>>>> handle_startup_fencing: Blind faith: not fencing unseen nodes
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:  warning:
>>>> handle_startup_fencing: Blind faith: not fencing unseen nodes
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:  warning:
>>>> handle_startup_fencing: Blind faith: not fencing unseen nodes
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:  warning:
>>>> handle_startup_fencing: Blind faith: not fencing unseen nodes
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:03 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:   notice:
>>>> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_helper01' to the device
>>>> list (1 active devices)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:04 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:   notice:
>>>> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_libvirt01' to the device
>>>> list (2 active devices)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:05 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:   notice:
>>>> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_helper02' to the device
>>>> list (3 active devices)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:06 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:   notice:
>>>> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_libvirt02' to the device
>>>> list (4 active devices)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:07 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:   notice:
>>>> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_helper03' to the device
>>>> list (5 active devices)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:08 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:   notice:
>>>> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_libvirt03' to the device
>>>> list (6 active devices)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:08 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info: cib_device_update:
>>>> Device prmStonith_helper04 has been disabled on vm04: score=-INFINITY
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:08 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:     info: cib_device_update:
>>>> Device prmStonith_libvirt04 has been disabled on vm04: score=-INFINITY
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:09 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:   notice:
>>>> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_helper05' to the device
>>>> list (7 active devices)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:10 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:   notice:
>>>> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_libvirt05' to the device
>>>> list (8 active devices)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:11 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:   notice:
>>>> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_helper06' to the device
>>>> list (9 active devices)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:12 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:   notice:
>>>> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_libvirt06' to the device
>>>> list (10 active devices)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:13 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:   notice:
>>>> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_helper07' to the device
>>>> list (11 active devices)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:14 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:   notice:
>>>> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_libvirt07' to the device
>>>> list (12 active devices)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:15 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:   notice:
>>>> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_helper08' to the device
>>>> list (13 active devices)
>>>> Jun  2 11:34:16 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]:   notice:
>>>> stonith_device_register: Added 'prmStonith_libvirt08' to the device
>>>> list (14 active devices)
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Yusuke
>>>> 
>>>> 2014-06-02 20:31 GMT+09:00 Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2 Jun 2014, at 3:05 pm, Yusuke Iida <yusk.iida at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi, Andrew
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I use the newest of 1.1 brunches and am testing by eight sets of nodes.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Although the problem was settled once,
>>>>>> Now, the problem with which queue overflows between cib and stonithd
>>>>>> has recurred.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> As an example, I paste the log of the DC node.
>>>>>> The problem is occurring on all nodes.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 cib[3940]:    error: crm_ipcs_flush_events:
>>>>>> Evicting slow client 0x250afe0[3941]: event queue reached 638 entries
>>>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[3941]:    error: crm_ipc_read:
>>>>>> Connection to cib_rw failed
>>>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[3941]:    error:
>>>>>> mainloop_gio_callback: Connection to cib_rw[0x662510] closed (I/O
>>>>>> condition=17)
>>>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[3941]:   notice:
>>>>>> cib_connection_destroy: Connection to the CIB terminated. Shutting
>>>>>> down.
>>>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[3941]:     info: stonith_shutdown:
>>>>>> Terminating with  2 clients
>>>>>> Jun  2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[3941]:     info: qb_ipcs_us_withdraw:
>>>>>> withdrawing server sockets
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> After loading a resource setup, time for stonithd to build device
>>>>>> information is long.
>>>>>> It has taken the time for about about 15 seconds.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 15 seconds!! Yikes. I'll investigate tomorrow.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> It seems that the diff message of cib accumulates between them.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Are there any plans to improve on this issue?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I attach a report when a problem occurs.
>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwMFJItoO-fVUEFEN1NlelNWRjg/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Yusuke
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>>> METRO SYSTEMS CO., LTD
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Yusuke Iida
>>>>>> Mail: yusk.iida at gmail.com
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>>>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>>>> 
>>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>> METRO SYSTEMS CO., LTD
>>>> 
>>>> Yusuke Iida
>>>> Mail: yusk.iida at gmail.com
>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>>> 
>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>> 
>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ----------------------------------------
> METRO SYSTEMS CO., LTD
> 
> Yusuke Iida
> Mail: yusk.iida at gmail.com
> ----------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20140604/41c59e03/attachment-0004.sig>

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list