[Pacemaker] Alternative communication engine to corosync (etcd/consul/zookeeper/doozerd)

[Andrew Beekhof]

On 20 Jun 2014, at 2:14 pm, Patrick Hemmer <pacemaker at feystorm.net> wrote:

> After the demise of the old heartbeat service, and the switch to corosync as the primary (sole) method of communication between nodes,

heartbeat is still supported as a messaging/membership layer

> has there ever been any consideration into using services such as etcd, consul, zookeeper, or doozerd?

I think most of these didn't exist at the time.
Do any provide membership too?  What about message ordering?

> 
> These alternative communication engines offer some stuff that corosync doesn't. One such item etcd & consul offer is dynamic cluster scaling capabilities (nodes can very easily join and leave the cluster). When working in cloud computing, this feature becomes very important. Pcs is somewhat helpful in this regard but it's still nowhere near as capable (plus corosync doesn't have downscaling finished).
> However one critical difference between these services and corosync is that they are mainly key/value stores, and don't have something like Corosync's CPG.

Yes, a rather critical difference.

> Though you could probably implement something looking like CPG using a keyvalue store,

I rather doubt it.  k/v stores and CPG are not very alike from where I'm sitting.

> I think pacemaker might be able to use a key/value store natively.
> 
> So, has this ever been considered? How heavily tied is pacemaker to the corosync API? Could that be abstracted out enough to where different communication engines could be implemented?

It's already abstracted to the point where it supports 4 different messaging/membership options:
- heartbeat
- corosync/pacemaker plugin
- cman
- corosync 2

> 
> 
> -Patrick
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20140620/b2f68c63/attachment-0003.sig>