[Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1: cloned stonith resources require --force to be added to levels

[Giuseppe Ragusa]

From: andrew at beekhof.net
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 22:50:28 +1000
To: pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1: cloned stonith resources require	--force to be added to levels

 
On 4 Jul 2014, at 1:29 pm, Giuseppe Ragusa <giuseppe.ragusa at hotmail.com> wrote:
 
> >> Hi all,
> >> while creating a cloned stonith resource
> > 
> > Any particular reason you feel the need to clone it?
>  
> In the end, I suppose it's only a "purist mindset" :) because it is a PDU whose power outlets control both nodes, so
> its resource "should be" active (and monitored) on both nodes "independently".
> I understand that it would work anyway, leaving it not cloned and not location-constrained
> just as regular, "dedicated" stonith devices would not need to be location-constrained, right?
> 
> >> for multi-level STONITH on a fully-up-to-date CentOS 6.5 (pacemaker-1.1.10-14.el6_5.3.x86_64):
> >> 
> >> pcs cluster cib stonith_cfg
> >> pcs -f stonith_cfg stonith create pdu1 fence_apc action="off" \
> >>     ipaddr="pdu1.verolengo.privatelan" login="cluster" passwd="test" \    pcmk_host_map="cluster1.verolengo.privatelan:3,cluster1.verolengo.privatelan:4,cluster2.verolengo.privatelan:6,cluster2.verolengo.privatelan:7" \
> >>     pcmk_host_check="static-list" pcmk_host_list="cluster1.verolengo.privatelan,cluster2.verolengo.privatelan" op monitor interval="240s"
> >> pcs -f stonith_cfg resource clone pdu1 pdu1Clone
> >> pcs -f stonith_cfg stonith level add 2 cluster1.verolengo.privatelan pdu1Clone
> >> pcs -f stonith_cfg stonith level add 2 cluster2.verolengo.privatelan pdu1Clone
> >> 
> >> 
> >> the last 2 lines do not succeed unless I add the option "--force" and even so I still get errors when issuing verify:
> >> 
> >> [root at cluster1 ~]# pcs stonith level verify
> >> Error: pdu1Clone is not a stonith id
> > 
> > If you check, I think you'll find there is no such resource as 'pdu1Clone'.
> > I don't believe pcs lets you decide what the clone name is.
> 
> You're right! (obviously ;> )
> It's been automatically named pdu1-clone
> 
> I suppose that there's still too much crmsh in my memory :)
> 
> Anyway, removing the stonith level (to start from scratch) and using the correct clone name does not change the result:
> 
> [root at cluster1 etc]# pcs -f stonith_cfg stonith level add 2 cluster1.verolengo.privatelan pdu1-clone
> Error: pdu1-clone is not a stonith id (use --force to override)
 
I bet we didn't think of that.
What if you just do:
 
   pcs -f stonith_cfg stonith level add 2 cluster1.verolengo.privatelan pdu1
 
Does that work?
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, no errors at all and verify successful.

Remember that a full real test (to verify actual second level functionality in presence of first level failure)
is still pending for both the plain and cloned setup.

Apropos: I read through the list archives that stonith resources (being resources, after all)
could themselves cause fencing (!) if failing (start, monitor, stop) and that an ad-hoc
on-fail setting could be used to prevent that.
Maybe my aforementioned naive testing procedure (pull the iLO cable) could provoke that?
Would you suggest to configure such an on-fail option?

Many thanks again for your help (and all your valuable work, of course!).

Regards,
Giuseppe
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20140704/6775e359/attachment.htm>