[Pacemaker] hangs pending
Andrey Groshev
greenx at yandex.ru
Wed Feb 19 12:18:04 EST 2014
19.02.2014, 06:47, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
> On 18 Feb 2014, at 9:29 pm, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>
>> Hi, ALL and Andrew!
>>
>> Today is a good day - I killed a lot, and a lot of shooting at me.
>> In general - I am happy (almost like an elephant) :)
>> Except resources on the node are important to me eight processes: corosync,pacemakerd,cib,stonithd,lrmd,attrd,pengine,crmd.
>> I killed them with different signals (4,6,11 and even 9).
>> Behavior does not depend of number signal - it's good.
>> If STONITH send reboot to the node - it rebooted and rejoined the cluster - too it's good.
>> But the behavior is different from killing various demons.
>>
>> Turned four groups:
>> 1. corosync,cib - STONITH work 100%.
>> Kill via any signals - call STONITH and reboot.
>
> excellent
>
>> 3. stonithd,attrd,pengine - not need STONITH
>> This daemons simple restart, resources - stay running.
>
> right
>
>> 2. lrmd,crmd - strange behavior STONITH.
>> Sometimes called STONITH - and the corresponding reaction.
>> Sometimes restart daemon
>
> The daemon will always try to restart, the only variable is how long it takes the peer to notice and initiate fencing.
> If the failure happens just before a they're due to receive totem token, the failure will be very quickly detected and the node fenced.
> If the failure happens just after, then detection will take longer - giving the node longer to recover and not be fenced.
>
> So fence/not fence is normal and to be expected.
>
>> and restart resources with large delay MS:pgsql.
>> One time after restart crmd - pgsql don't restart.
>
> I would not expect pgsql to ever restart - if the RA does its job properly anyway.
> In the case the node is not fenced, the crmd will respawn and the the PE will request that it re-detect the state of all resources.
>
> If the agent reports "all good", then there is nothing more to do.
> If the agent is not reporting "all good", you should really be asking why.
>
>> 4. pacemakerd - nothing happens.
>
> On non-systemd based machines, correct.
>
> On a systemd based machine pacemakerd is respawned and reattaches to the existing daemons.
> Any subsequent daemon failure will be detected and the daemon respawned.
And! I almost forgot about IT!
Exist another (NORMAL) the variants, the methods, the ideas?
Without this ... @$%#$%&$%^&$%^&##@#$$^$%& !!!!!
Otherwise - it's a full epic fail ;)
>> And then I can kill any process of the third group. They do not restart.
>
> Until they become needed.
> Eg. if the DC goes to invoke the policy engine, that will fail causing the crmd to fail and the node to be fenced.
>
>> Generaly don't touch corosync,cib and maybe lrmd,crmd.
>>
>> What do you think about this?
>> The main question of this topic - we decided.
>> But this varied behavior - another big problem.
>>
>> 17.02.2014, 08:52, "Andrey Groshev" <greenx at yandex.ru>:
>>> 17.02.2014, 02:27, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>> With no quick follow-up, dare one hope that means the patch worked? :-)
>>> Hi,
>>> No, unfortunately the chief changed my plans on Friday and all day I was engaged in a parallel project.
>>> I hope that today have time to carry out the necessary tests.
>>>> On 14 Feb 2014, at 3:37 pm, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>> Yes, of course. Now beginning build world and test )
>>>>>
>>>>> 14.02.2014, 04:41, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>> The previous patch wasn't quite right.
>>>>>> Could you try this new one?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/77123/13923376/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [11:23 AM] beekhof at f19 ~/Development/sources/pacemaker/devel ☺ # git diff
>>>>>> diff --git a/crmd/callbacks.c b/crmd/callbacks.c
>>>>>> index ac4b905..d49525b 100644
>>>>>> --- a/crmd/callbacks.c
>>>>>> +++ b/crmd/callbacks.c
>>>>>> @@ -199,8 +199,7 @@ peer_update_callback(enum crm_status_type type, crm_node_t * node, const void *d
>>>>>> stop_te_timer(down->timer);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> flags |= node_update_join | node_update_expected;
>>>>>> - crm_update_peer_join(__FUNCTION__, node, crm_join_none);
>>>>>> - crm_update_peer_expected(__FUNCTION__, node, CRMD_JOINSTATE_DOWN);
>>>>>> + crmd_peer_down(node, FALSE);
>>>>>> check_join_state(fsa_state, __FUNCTION__);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> update_graph(transition_graph, down);
>>>>>> diff --git a/crmd/crmd_utils.h b/crmd/crmd_utils.h
>>>>>> index bc472c2..1a2577a 100644
>>>>>> --- a/crmd/crmd_utils.h
>>>>>> +++ b/crmd/crmd_utils.h
>>>>>> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ void crmd_join_phase_log(int level);
>>>>>> const char *get_timer_desc(fsa_timer_t * timer);
>>>>>> gboolean too_many_st_failures(void);
>>>>>> void st_fail_count_reset(const char * target);
>>>>>> +void crmd_peer_down(crm_node_t *peer, bool full);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # define fsa_register_cib_callback(id, flag, data, fn) do { \
>>>>>> fsa_cib_conn->cmds->register_callback( \
>>>>>> diff --git a/crmd/te_actions.c b/crmd/te_actions.c
>>>>>> index f31d4ec..3bfce59 100644
>>>>>> --- a/crmd/te_actions.c
>>>>>> +++ b/crmd/te_actions.c
>>>>>> @@ -80,11 +80,8 @@ send_stonith_update(crm_action_t * action, const char *target, const char *uuid)
>>>>>> crm_info("Recording uuid '%s' for node '%s'", uuid, target);
>>>>>> peer->uuid = strdup(uuid);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> - crm_update_peer_proc(__FUNCTION__, peer, crm_proc_none, NULL);
>>>>>> - crm_update_peer_state(__FUNCTION__, peer, CRM_NODE_LOST, 0);
>>>>>> - crm_update_peer_expected(__FUNCTION__, peer, CRMD_JOINSTATE_DOWN);
>>>>>> - crm_update_peer_join(__FUNCTION__, peer, crm_join_none);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + crmd_peer_down(peer, TRUE);
>>>>>> node_state =
>>>>>> do_update_node_cib(peer,
>>>>>> node_update_cluster | node_update_peer | node_update_join |
>>>>>> diff --git a/crmd/te_utils.c b/crmd/te_utils.c
>>>>>> index ad7e573..0c92e95 100644
>>>>>> --- a/crmd/te_utils.c
>>>>>> +++ b/crmd/te_utils.c
>>>>>> @@ -247,10 +247,7 @@ tengine_stonith_notify(stonith_t * st, stonith_event_t * st_event)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - crm_update_peer_proc(__FUNCTION__, peer, crm_proc_none, NULL);
>>>>>> - crm_update_peer_state(__FUNCTION__, peer, CRM_NODE_LOST, 0);
>>>>>> - crm_update_peer_expected(__FUNCTION__, peer, CRMD_JOINSTATE_DOWN);
>>>>>> - crm_update_peer_join(__FUNCTION__, peer, crm_join_none);
>>>>>> + crmd_peer_down(peer, TRUE);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/crmd/utils.c b/crmd/utils.c
>>>>>> index 3988cfe..2df53ab 100644
>>>>>> --- a/crmd/utils.c
>>>>>> +++ b/crmd/utils.c
>>>>>> @@ -1077,3 +1077,13 @@ update_attrd_remote_node_removed(const char *host, const char *user_name)
>>>>>> crm_trace("telling attrd to clear attributes for remote host %s", host);
>>>>>> update_attrd_helper(host, NULL, NULL, user_name, TRUE, 'C');
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +void crmd_peer_down(crm_node_t *peer, bool full)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + if(full && peer->state == NULL) {
>>>>>> + crm_update_peer_state(__FUNCTION__, peer, CRM_NODE_LOST, 0);
>>>>>> + crm_update_peer_proc(__FUNCTION__, peer, crm_proc_none, NULL);
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> + crm_update_peer_join(__FUNCTION__, peer, crm_join_none);
>>>>>> + crm_update_peer_expected(__FUNCTION__, peer, CRMD_JOINSTATE_DOWN);
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 16 Jan 2014, at 7:24 pm, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>> 16.01.2014, 01:30, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>>>> On 16 Jan 2014, at 12:41 am, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 15.01.2014, 02:53, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>>>>>> On 15 Jan 2014, at 12:15 am, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 14.01.2014, 10:00, "Andrey Groshev" <greenx at yandex.ru>:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 14.01.2014, 07:47, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, here's what happens:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. node2 is lost
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. fencing of node2 starts
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. node2 reboots (and cluster starts)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. node2 returns to the membership
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. node2 is marked as a cluster member
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6. DC tries to bring it into the cluster, but needs to cancel the active transition first.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which is a problem since the node2 fencing operation is part of that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7. node2 is in a transition (pending) state until fencing passes or fails
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8a. fencing fails: transition completes and the node joins the cluster
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thats in theory, except we automatically try again. Which isn't appropriate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This should be relatively easy to fix.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8b. fencing passes: the node is incorrectly marked as offline
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This I have no idea how to fix yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On another note, it doesn't look like this agent works at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The node has been back online for a long time and the agent is still timing out after 10 minutes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So "Once the script makes sure that the victim will rebooted and again available via ssh - it exit with 0." does not seem true.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Damn. Looks like you're right. At some time I broke my agent and had not noticed it. Who will understand.
>>>>>>>>>>> I repaired my agent - after send reboot he is wait STDIN.
>>>>>>>>>>> Returned "normally" a behavior - hangs "pending", until manually send reboot. :)
>>>>>>>>>> Right. Now you're in case 8b.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Can you try this patch: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/68450/38973966
>>>>>>>>> Killed all day experiences.
>>>>>>>>> It turns out here that:
>>>>>>>>> 1. Did cluster.
>>>>>>>>> 2. On the node-2 send signal (-4) - killed corosink
>>>>>>>>> 3. From node-1 (there DC) - stonith sent reboot
>>>>>>>>> 4. Noda rebooted and resources start.
>>>>>>>>> 5. Again. On the node-2 send signal (-4) - killed corosink
>>>>>>>>> 6. Again. From node-1 (there DC) - stonith sent reboot
>>>>>>>>> 7. Noda-2 rebooted and hangs in "pending"
>>>>>>>>> 8. Waiting, waiting..... manually reboot.
>>>>>>>>> 9. Noda-2 reboot and raised resources start.
>>>>>>>>> 10. GOTO p.2
>>>>>>>> Logs?
>>>>>>> Yesterday I wrote an additional letter why not put the logs.
>>>>>>> Read it please, it contains a few more questions.
>>>>>>> Today again began to hang and continue along the same cycle.
>>>>>>> Logs here http://send2me.ru/crmrep2.tar.bz2
>>>>>>>>>>> New logs: http://send2me.ru/crmrep1.tar.bz2
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14 Jan 2014, at 1:19 pm, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apart from anything else, your timeout needs to be bigger:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jan 13 12:21:36 [17223] dev-cluster2-node1.unix.tensor.ru stonith-ng: ( commands.c:1321 ) error: log_operation: Operation 'reboot' [11331] (call 2 from crmd.17227) for host 'dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru' with device 'st1' returned: -62 (Timer expired)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14 Jan 2014, at 7:18 am, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13 Jan 2014, at 8:31 pm, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13.01.2014, 02:51, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 Jan 2014, at 9:55 pm, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10.01.2014, 14:31, "Andrey Groshev" <greenx at yandex.ru>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10.01.2014, 14:01, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 Jan 2014, at 5:03 pm, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10.01.2014, 05:29, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9 Jan 2014, at 11:11 pm, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 08.01.2014, 06:22, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 29 Nov 2013, at 7:17 pm, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, ALL.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm still trying to cope with the fact that after the fence - node hangs in "pending".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please define "pending". Where did you see this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In crm_mon:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ......
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Node dev-cluster2-node2 (172793105): pending
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ......
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The experiment was like this:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Four nodes in cluster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On one of them kill corosync or pacemakerd (signal 4 or 6 oк 11).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thereafter, the remaining start it constantly reboot, under various pretexts, "softly whistling", "fly low", "not a cluster member!" ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then in the log fell out "Too many failures ...."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All this time in the status in crm_mon is "pending".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Depending on the wind direction changed to "UNCLEAN"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Much time has passed and I can not accurately describe the behavior...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now I am in the following state:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I tried locate the problem. Came here with this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I set big value in property stonith-timeout="600s".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And got the following behavior:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. pkill -4 corosync
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. from node with DC call my fence agent "sshbykey"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. It sends reboot victim and waits until she comes to life again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm.... what version of pacemaker?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This sounds like a timing issue that we fixed a while back
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Was a version 1.1.11 from December 3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now try full update and retest.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That should be recent enough. Can you create a crm_report the next time you reproduce?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course yes. Little delay.... :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ......
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upstart.c: In function ‘upstart_job_property’:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upstart.c:264: error: implicit declaration of function ‘g_variant_lookup_value’
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upstart.c:264: error: nested extern declaration of ‘g_variant_lookup_value’
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upstart.c:264: error: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmake[2]: *** [libcrmservice_la-upstart.lo] Error 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/root/ha/pacemaker/lib/services'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/ha/pacemaker/lib'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make: *** [core] Error 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to solve this a problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do not get solved quickly...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://developer.gnome.org/glib/2.28/glib-GVariant.html#g-variant-lookup-value
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> g_variant_lookup_value () Since 2.28
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # yum list installed glib2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, rhnplugin, security
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This system is receiving updates from RHN Classic or Red Hat Satellite.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Installed Packages
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> glib2.x86_64 2.26.1-3.el6 installed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # cat /etc/issue
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CentOS release 6.5 (Final)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kernel \r on an \m
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you try this patch?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Upstart jobs wont work, but the code will compile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/lib/services/upstart.c b/lib/services/upstart.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> index 831e7cf..195c3a4 100644
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/lib/services/upstart.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/lib/services/upstart.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -231,12 +231,21 @@ upstart_job_exists(const char *name)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> static char *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upstart_job_property(const char *obj, const gchar * iface, const char *name)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + char *output = NULL;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +#if !GLIB_CHECK_VERSION(2,28,0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + static bool err = TRUE;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + if(err) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + crm_err("This version of glib is too old to support upstart jobs");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + err = FALSE;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +#else
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GError *error = NULL;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GDBusProxy *proxy;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GVariant *asv = NULL;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GVariant *value = NULL;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GVariant *_ret = NULL;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - char *output = NULL;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crm_info("Calling GetAll on %s", obj);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proxy = get_proxy(obj, BUS_PROPERTY_IFACE);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -272,6 +281,7 @@ upstart_job_property(const char *obj, const gchar * iface, const char *name)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> g_object_unref(proxy);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> g_variant_unref(_ret);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +#endif
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return output;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok :) I patch source.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Type "make rc" - the same error.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because its not building your local changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Make new copy via "fetch" - the same error.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems that if not exist ClusterLabs-pacemaker-Pacemaker-1.1.11-rc3.tar.gz, then download it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise use exist archive.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cutted log .......
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # make rc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make TAG=Pacemaker-1.1.11-rc3 rpm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make[1]: Entering directory `/root/ha/pacemaker'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rm -f pacemaker-dirty.tar.* pacemaker-tip.tar.* pacemaker-HEAD.tar.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if [ ! -f ClusterLabs-pacemaker-Pacemaker-1.1.11-rc3.tar.gz ]; then \
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rm -f pacemaker.tar.*; \
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if [ Pacemaker-1.1.11-rc3 = dirty ]; then \
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git commit -m "DO-NOT-PUSH" -a; \
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git archive --prefix=ClusterLabs-pacemaker-Pacemaker-1.1.11-rc3/ HEAD | gzip > ClusterLabs-pacemaker-Pacemaker-1.1.11-rc3.tar.gz; \
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git reset --mixed HEAD^; \
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> else \
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git archive --prefix=ClusterLabs-pacemaker-Pacemaker-1.1.11-rc3/ Pacemaker-1.1.11-rc3 | gzip > ClusterLabs-pacemaker-Pacemaker-1.1.11-rc3.tar.gz; \
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fi; \
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> echo `date`: Rebuilt ClusterLabs-pacemaker-Pacemaker-1.1.11-rc3.tar.gz; \
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> else \
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> echo `date`: Using existing tarball: ClusterLabs-pacemaker-Pacemaker-1.1.11-rc3.tar.gz; \
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mon Jan 13 13:23:21 MSK 2014: Using existing tarball: ClusterLabs-pacemaker-Pacemaker-1.1.11-rc3.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .......
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, "make rpm" - build rpms and I create cluster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I spent the same tests and confirmed the behavior.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crm_reoprt log here - http://send2me.ru/crmrep.tar.bz2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>>>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>>> ,
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>>>>>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>>>>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>> ,
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>>>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>> ,
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>>>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>>>>
>>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>>> ,
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>>>
>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>>
>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>
>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
> ,
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list