[Pacemaker] [libqb]Unlink of files bound to sockets
David Vossel
dvossel at redhat.com
Fri Dec 19 19:19:12 UTC 2014
----- Original Message -----
> I used the current trunk.
> I could not find the unlink calls.
>
> If domain sockets are used this two methods are used.
>
> In ./lib/ipc_socket.c
> static void
> qb_ipcc_us_disconnect(struct qb_ipcc_connection *c)
> {
> munmap(c->request.u.us.shared_data, SHM_CONTROL_SIZE);
> unlink(c->request.u.us.shared_file_name);
right, so here we're doing the unlinking of the shared file.
There's some trick we're using to only have a single file created
for all 3 sockets.
Is this not working for solaris?
> qb_ipcc_us_sock_close(c->event.u.us.sock);
> qb_ipcc_us_sock_close(c->request.u.us.sock);
> qb_ipcc_us_sock_close(c->setup.u.us.sock);
> }
>
> In ./lib/ipc_setup.c
> void
> qb_ipcc_us_sock_close(int32_t sock)
> {
> shutdown(sock, SHUT_RDWR);
> close(sock);
> }
>
> I added in the latter the unlink calls.
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: David Vossel [mailto:dvossel at redhat.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2014 18:13
> An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] [libqb]Unlink of files bound to sockets
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> >
> >
> > I sent yesterday this email to the mailing list of libq
> > 'quarterback-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org'.
> >
> > But there is nearly no activity since august.
>
> i saw the email. i flagged it so it would get a response.
>
> >
> > I use the current trunk of libqb.
> >
> > In qb_ipcc_us_sock_close nd qb_ipcs_us_withdraw of lib/ipc_setup.c
> > sockets are closed.
> >
> > Is there a reason why the files bound to the sockets are not deleted
> > with unlink?
> >
> > Is unlinking not necessary with Linux?
>
> Unlinking is required for linux.
>
> For client/server connections.
>
> qb_ipcc_us_disconnect unlinks on the client side.
> qb_ipcs_us_disconnect unlinks on the server side.
>
>
> > I found thousands of files in statedir=/var/corosync/run after a while.
>
> What version of corosync are you using? There were some reference leaks for
> ipc connections in the corosync code we fixed a year or so ago that should
> have fixed this.
>
> -- David
>
> >
> >
> > I tried this and it seems to work without errors.
> >
> >
> >
> > e.g.
> >
> > void
> >
> > qb_ipcc_us_sock_close(int32_t sock)
> >
> > {
> >
> > #ifdef QB_SOLARIS
> >
> > struct sockaddr_un un_addr;
> >
> > socklen_t un_addr_len = sizeof(struct sockaddr_un);
> >
> > #endif
> >
> > shutdown(sock, SHUT_RDWR);
> >
> > #ifdef QB_SOLARIS
> >
> > if (getsockname(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&un_addr, &un_addr_len) == 0)
> > {
> >
> > if(strstr(un_addr.sun_path,"-") != NULL) {
> >
> > qb_util_log(LOG_DEBUG, "un_addr.sun_path=%s", un_addr.sun_path);
> >
> > unlink(un_addr.sun_path);
> >
> > }
> >
> > } else {
> >
> > qb_util_log(LOG_DEBUG, "getsockname returned errno=%d", errno);
> >
> > }
> >
> > #endif
> >
> > close(sock);
> >
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> >
> > Andreas
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> >
> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started:
> > http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started:
> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list