[Pacemaker] different behavior cibadmin -Ql with cman and corosync2
Andrey Groshev
greenx at yandex.ru
Wed Sep 11 04:57:44 UTC 2013
Hello Christine, Andrew and all.
I'm sorry - a little was unwell, so did not answer.
What we end this stream of messages?
Who will change? corosync or pacemaker?
05.09.2013, 15:49, "Christine Caulfield" <ccaulfie at redhat.com>:
> On 05/09/13 11:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> On 05/09/2013, at 6:37 PM, Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 03/09/13 22:03, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>> On 03/09/2013, at 11:49 PM, Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 03/09/13 05:20, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>>>> On 02/09/2013, at 5:27 PM, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>> 30.08.2013, 07:18, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>>>> On 29/08/2013, at 7:31 PM, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 29.08.2013, 12:25, "Andrey Groshev" <greenx at yandex.ru>:
>>>>>>>>>> 29.08.2013, 02:55, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 28/08/2013, at 5:38 PM, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 28.08.2013, 04:06, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 27/08/2013, at 1:13 PM, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 27.08.2013, 05:39, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/08/2013, at 3:09 PM, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 26.08.2013, 03:34, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/08/2013, at 9:39 PM, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Today I try remake my test cluster from cman to corosync2.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I drew attention to the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I reset cluster with cman through cibadmin --erase --force
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In cib is still there exist names of nodes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, the cluster puts back entries for all the nodes it know about automagically.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cibadmin -Ql
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nodes>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <node id="dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru" uname="dev-cluster2-node2"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <node id="dev-cluster2-node4.unix.tensor.ru" uname="dev-cluster2-node4"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <node id="dev-cluster2-node3.unix.tensor.ru" uname="dev-cluster2-node3"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </nodes>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even if cman and pacemaker running only one node.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm assuming all three are configured in cluster.conf?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, there exist list nodes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if I do too on cluster with corosync2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see only names of nodes which run corosync and pacemaker.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since you're not included your config, I can only guess that your corosync.conf does not have a nodelist.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If it did, you should get the same behaviour.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I try and expected_node and nodelist.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And it didn't work? What version of pacemaker?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does not work as I expected.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thats because you've used IP addresses in the node list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ie.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> node {
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ring0_addr: 10.76.157.17
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> try including the node name as well, eg.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> node {
>>>>>>>>>>>>> name: dev-cluster2-node2
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ring0_addr: 10.76.157.17
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>> The same thing.
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know what to say. I tested it here yesterday and it worked as expected.
>>>>>>>>>> I found that the reason that You and I have different results - I did not have reverse DNS zone for these nodes.
>>>>>>>>>> I know what it should be, but (PACEMAKER + CMAN) worked without a reverse area!
>>>>>>>>> Hasty. Deleted all. Reinstalled. Configured. Not working again. Damn!
>>>>>>>> It would have surprised me... pacemaker 1.1.11 doesn't do any dns lookups - reverse or otherwise.
>>>>>>>> Can you set
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> PCMK_trace_files=corosync.c
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> in your environment and retest?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On RHEL6 that means putting the following in /etc/sysconfig/pacemaker
>>>>>>>> export PCMK_trace_files=corosync.c
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It should produce additional logging[1] that will help diagnose the issue.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] http://blog.clusterlabs.org/blog/2013/pacemaker-logging/
>>>>>>> Hello, Andrew.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are a little misunderstood me.
>>>>>> No, I understood you fine.
>>>>>>> I wrote that I rushed to judgment.
>>>>>>> After I did the reverse DNS zone, the cluster behaved correctly.
>>>>>>> BUT after I took apart the cluster dropped configs and restarted on the new cluster,
>>>>>>> cluster again don't showed all the nodes in the nodes (only node with running pacemaker).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A small portion of the log. Full log
>>>>>>> In which (I thought) there is something interesting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aug 30 12:31:11 [9986] dev-cluster2-node4 cib: ( corosync.c:423 ) trace: check_message_sanity: Verfied message 4: (dest=<all>:cib, from=dev-cluster2-node4:cib.9986, compressed=0, size=1551, total=2143)
>>>>>>> Aug 30 12:31:11 [9989] dev-cluster2-node4 attrd: ( corosync.c:96 ) trace: corosync_node_name: Checking 172793107 vs 0 from nodelist.node.0.nodeid
>>>>>>> Aug 30 12:31:11 [9989] dev-cluster2-node4 attrd: ( ipcc.c:378 ) debug: qb_ipcc_disconnect: qb_ipcc_disconnect()
>>>>>>> Aug 30 12:31:11 [9989] dev-cluster2-node4 attrd: (ringbuffer.c:294 ) debug: qb_rb_close: Closing ringbuffer: /dev/shm/qb-cmap-request-9616-9989-27-header
>>>>>>> Aug 30 12:31:11 [9989] dev-cluster2-node4 attrd: (ringbuffer.c:294 ) debug: qb_rb_close: Closing ringbuffer: /dev/shm/qb-cmap-response-9616-9989-27-header
>>>>>>> Aug 30 12:31:11 [9989] dev-cluster2-node4 attrd: (ringbuffer.c:294 ) debug: qb_rb_close: Closing ringbuffer: /dev/shm/qb-cmap-event-9616-9989-27-header
>>>>>>> Aug 30 12:31:11 [9989] dev-cluster2-node4 attrd: ( corosync.c:134 ) notice: corosync_node_name: Unable to get node name for nodeid 172793107
>>>>>> I wonder if you need to be including the nodeid too. ie.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> node {
>>>>>> name: dev-cluster2-node2
>>>>>> ring0_addr: 10.76.157.17
>>>>>> nodeid: 2
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I _thought_ that was implicit.
>>>>>> Chrissie: is "nodelist.node.%d.nodeid" always available for corosync2 or only if explicitly defined in the config?
>>>>> You do need to specify a nodeid if you don't want corosync to imply it from the IP address (or you're using IPv6). corosync won't imply a nodeif from the order of the nodes in corosync.conf - that's not reliable enough.
>>>> Right, but is that implied nodeid available as "nodelist.node.%d.nodeid"?
>>>> Andrey's results suggest "no" and I would claim this is not expected/good :)
>>> If you want to get the nodeid of the node you are on
>> No, we're trying to use a known nodeid to look up the other information in the node list - such as 'ring0_addr' or 'name'.
>
> votequorum_get_info()
>
> Chrissie
>
>>> there is both a corosync API call for it - totem_nodeid_get() - or you can get it from votequorum via cmap - runtime.votequorum.this_node_id
>>>
>>> The nodelist.* section of cmap is really meant to reflect what is in corosync.conf and I don't really want to be writing into it. I know there is already nodelist.our_node_pos, but I'm not a fan of that either :P
>>>
>>> Chrissie
>>>>> Also bear in mind that 0 is not a valid node number :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Chrissie
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list