[Pacemaker] why not updated http://clusterlabs.org/rpm-next/ ..... ?

[Andrew Beekhof]

On 23/08/2013, at 3:02 PM, Andreas Mock <Andreas.Mock at web.de> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> I can only talk for myself: Please, please provide rpm-Packages
> of pacemaker 1.1.10 + fitting for RHEL 6.x.
> 
> Is this feasible with not too much effort for you? *

I had hoped to get out of the packaging business by making it not too much effort for anyone :-)

1. Obtain RHEL6.x box
2. Install dependancies if you haven't already:
   # sudo yum install -y yum-utils
   # make rpm-dep
3. Build Pacemaker
   # make release

Not good?

> 
> Best regards
> Andreas Mock
> 
> (* This is the question ;) )
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:andrew at beekhof.net] 
> Gesendet: Freitag, 23. August 2013 06:27
> An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] why not updated http://clusterlabs.org/rpm-next/
> ..... ?
> 
> 
> On 20/08/2013, at 8:49 PM, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
> 
>> Hello Andrew!
>> Why not updated http://clusterlabs.org/rpm-next/* ?
> 
> No-one asked :)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20130904/52990efa/attachment-0003.sig>