[Pacemaker] Question about the resource to fence a node
Lars Marowsky-Bree
lmb at suse.com
Tue Oct 15 10:40:04 UTC 2013
On 2013-10-15T18:24:46, Kazunori INOUE <kazunori.inoue3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Oct 15 15:17:16 vm2 stonith-ng[9160]: warning: log_operation: f1:9273
> [ Performing: stonith -t external/libvirt -T reset vm3 ]
> Oct 15 15:17:46 vm2 stonith-ng[9160]: warning: log_operation: f1:9588
> [ Performing: stonith -t external/libvirt -T reset vm3 ]
>
> Is it specifications?
Apparently, yes.
The "stonith resource" no longer signifies the node which will perform
the fence request, just the node where the monitor for the STONITH
device will be run.
I have opinions on this change (I liked the old behaviour much better),
but it's apparently intentional.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list