[Pacemaker] Service restoration in clone resource group

[Sean Lutner]

On Oct 8, 2013, at 9:33 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb at suse.com> wrote:

> On 2013-10-08T09:29:14, Sean Lutner <sean at rentul.net> wrote:
> 
>> The clone was created using the interleave=true option, yes. 
> 
> Ok, so pcs hides that (interesting to know).
> 
>> Does this have an affect on what I'm trying to accomplish?
> 
> Yes, if you hadn't set that, it might have been an explanation. My best
> guess right now would be to upgrade first; the PE has gotten quite a few
> fixes since 1.1.8 again.

Are you indicating that the behavior I expect to see, which is the resource being marked as Started on the now passive node, is what pacemaker should be doing and this could be a bug?

If it would help, I can provide a full cib configuration and logs while I execute the tests I've been running. I won't be able to do that until tonight (EST time) but can if it may help.

Thanks
Sean

> 
> 
> Regards,
>    Lars
> 
> -- 
> Architect Storage/HA
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 235 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20131008/c0451557/attachment-0004.sig>