[Pacemaker] pacemaker colocation after one node is down

[Andreas Kurz]

On 2013-05-15 21:30, Wolfgang Routschka wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>  
> one question today about colocation rule on a 2-node cluster on
> scientific linux 6.4 and pacemaker/cman.
>  
> 2-Node Cluster
>  
> first node haproxy load balancer proxy service - second node with
> postfix service.
>  
> colocation for running a group called g_ip-address (haproxy lsb-resouce
> and ipaddress resource) on the other node of the postfix server is
>  
> cl_g_ip-address_not_on_r_postfix -inf: g_ip-address r_postfix

-INF == never-ever ;-)

>  
> The problem is now that the node with haproxy is down pacemaker cannot
> move/migrate the services to the other node -ok second colocation with
> lower score but it doesn´t works for me
>  
> colocation cl_g_ip-address_on_r_postfix -1: g_ip-address r_postfix
>  
> Whats my fault in these section?

Hard to say without seeing the rest of your configuration, but you can
run "crm_simulate -s -L" to see all the scores taken into account.

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
Need help with Pacemaker?
http://www.hastexo.com/now

>  
> How can I migrate my group to the other if the master node for it is dead?
>  
> Greetings Wolfgang
>  
>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
> 




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 287 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20130515/2a392fa1/attachment-0004.sig>