[Pacemaker] Shared redundant machine

[Grant Bagdasarian]

Thank you for answering!

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:andrew at beekhof.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 5:40 AM
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Shared redundant machine


On 26/04/2013, at 7:05 PM, Grant Bagdasarian <GB at cm.nl> wrote:

> Hello,
>  
> Let's say I have three physical servers available to configure in a redundant way. I'm going to use two of the three servers to connect each to a different network. The one that is left over will be the fallback server for both primary servers. What needs to be done in this scenario is that the shared IP and a process running on the primary machines is migrated to the secondary server, in the case one or both servers fail. The same process runs on both primary machines.  
>  
> I'm not sure if this is possible.

It is.

> It was just an idea, and my experience with high availability isn't that great, aside from configuring a basic cluster and some resources. So I'm asking it here to the more experienced users.
>  
> Thanks,
> 
> Grant
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org 
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: 
> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org


_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org