[Pacemaker] will a stonith resource be moved from an AWOL node?

[Andrew Beekhof]

On 01/05/2013, at 1:28 AM, Brian J. Murrell <brian at interlinx.bc.ca> wrote:

> On 13-04-30 11:13 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>> 
>> Pacemaker 1.1.8's stonith/fencing subsystem directly ties into the CIB,
>> and will complete the fencing request even if the fencing/stonith
>> resource is not instantiated on the node yet.
> 
> But clearly that's not happening here.

Can you file a bug and attach the logs from both machines?

Unless... are you still using cman or the pacemaker plugin (as shipped or the patched one from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951340)?


> 
>> (There's a bug in 1.1.8 as
>> released that causes an annoying delay here, but that's fixed since.)
> 
> Do you know which bug specifically so that I can see if the fix has been
> applied here?
> 
>>> Node node1: UNCLEAN (pending)
>>> Online: [ node2 ]
>> 
>>> node1 is very clearly completely off.  The cluster has been in this state, with node1 being off for several 10s of minutes now and still the stonith resource is running on it.
>> 
>> It shouldn't take so long. 
> 
> Indeed.  And FWIW, it's still in that state.
> 
>> I think your easiest path is to update.
> 
> Update to what?  I'm already using pacemaker-1.1.8-7 on EL6 and a yum
> update is not providing anything newer.
> 
> Cheers,
> b.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org