[Pacemaker] Correct order of meta/params in crm

[Lars Marowsky-Bree]

On 2013-03-03T12:29:55, David Coulson <david at davidcoulson.net> wrote:

> We've seen instances where failure-timeout is set, but Pacemaker never seems
> to clean up the failure. First thought was it didn't actually utilize the
> meta failure-timeout parameter if it was in the wrong place. Probably need
> to troubleshoot it further and try to reproduce the issue.

My memory may be very faulty, but I thought this didn't lead to the
failure actually be cleaned up automatically, but "merely" ignored
post-timeout.


Regards,
    Lars

-- 
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde