[Pacemaker] Release model

[Andrew Beekhof]

On 28/06/2013, at 11:37 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb at suse.com> wrote:

>>> 
>>> I'm not sure there's a huge downside in it for you?
>> Ok, lets take attrd for example - which I've been wanted to rewrite to be truly atomic for half a decade or more.
> 
> If it's rewritten in a way that doesn't affect external users but that
> can be covered well by tests, I'd not think that having two versions of
> the code in parallel would make sense, yes.

attrd is quite tough to write unit tests for - almost all of its functionality requires multiple nodes.
hence why i picked it for illustration