[Pacemaker] Reminder: Pacemaker-1.1.10-rc5 is out there

[Andrew Beekhof]

On 25/06/2013, at 6:32 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb at suse.com> wrote:

> On 2013-06-25T10:16:58, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
> 
>> Ok, I recently became engaged in the PСMK, so for me it is a surprize.
>> The more so in all the major linux distributions version 1.1.х.
> 
> Pacemaker has very strong regression and system tests, and barring
> accidents, it is usually very safe to always deploy the latest version -
> even if it is "unstable".

Right, unstable for Pacemaker means APIs and feature sets.
If its super buggy it doesn't get released (or even merged into the ClusterLabs repo). 

> 
> Perhaps a numbering scheme like the Linux kernel would fit better than a
> stable/unstable branch distinction. Changes that deserve the "unstable"
> term are really really rare (and I'm sure we've all learned from them),
> so it may be better to then just have a slightly longer test cycle for
> these.

What about the API changes?