[Pacemaker] STONITH without mandatory success possible?
Vladislav Bogdanov
bubble at hoster-ok.com
Thu Jun 20 09:25:36 CEST 2013
20.06.2013 03:12, Sven Arnold wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
>> I have some 2-node active-passive clusters that occasionally lose
>> Corosync connectivity. The connectivity is fixed with a reboot.
>> They don't have shared storage so stonith doesn't have to happen for
>> another node to take control of the resource. Also they are VMs so I
>> can't use a standard stonith method.
>
> If you use virtual machines connected via a local bridge you could try
> to disable multicast snooping on your bridge to improve corosync
> connectivity. Similar to:
>
> echo "0" > /sys/class/net/virbr0/bridge/multicast_snooping
That results in multicast packets are broadcasted to all bridge ports. I
prefer to have igmp querier turned on on a central switch.
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list