[Pacemaker] Question about the behavior when a pacemaker's process crashed

[Andrew Beekhof]

On 12/07/2013, at 6:28 PM, Kazunori INOUE <inouekazu at intellilink.co.jp> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I'm using pacemaker-1.1.10.
> When a pacemaker's process crashed, the node is sometimes fenced or is not sometimes fenced.
> Is this the assumed behavior?

Yes.

Sometimes the dev1 respawns the processes fast enough that dev2 gets the "hey, i'm back" notification before the PE gets run and fencing can be initiated.
In such cases, there is nothing to be gained from fencing - dev1 is reachable and responding.


It makes writing CTS tests hard, but it is not incorrect.

> 
> procedure:
> $ systemctl start pacemaker
> $ crm configure load update test.cli
> $ pkill -9 lrmd
> 
> attachment:
> STONITH.tar.bz2 : it's crm_report when fenced
> notSTONITH.tar.bz2 : it's crm_report when not fenced
> 
> Best regards.
> <notSTONITH.tar.bz2><STONITH.tar.bz2>_______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org