[Pacemaker] Question concerning pacemaker-1-1-10-rc6

[Andreas Mock]

Hi Andrew,

is it much work to provide the release candidate also as
complete package on the mentioned site?
Or is it against some policy?

Anyway: The last version pacemaker-1.1.10-3.1736.37b9108.git.el6.x86_64.rpm
seems to work pretty well.

Best regards
Andreas



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:andrew at beekhof.net] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. Juli 2013 04:09
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Question concerning pacemaker-1-1-10-rc6


On 08/07/2013, at 5:57 PM, Andreas Mock <Andreas.Mock at web.de> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> I'm taking the builds from
> http://clusterlabs.org/rpm-test-next/rhel-6/x86_64/
> to avoid compiling on my own.
> Do these build relate to the release candidates you're announcing?

Not at all, those are whatever I happen to be testing at the time.
They do include the git hash in the rpm names though.

> If yes, could you also announce the version strings?
> 
> Best regards
> Andreas Mock
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org 
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: 
> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org


_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started:
http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org