[Pacemaker] booth is the state of "started" on pacemaker before booth write ticket info in cib.

[Yuichi SEINO]

Hi Jiaju,

I have a suggestion about this issue. Could you revert the following commit?
https://github.com/jjzhang/booth/commit/4b00d46480f45a205f2550ff0760c8b372009f7f

Because the suitable log can't be output, we took in this fix. Even If
this commit is reverted,  the behavior of booth should not be affect.
And, this issue is more important than this commit.

Sincerely,
Yuichi

2012/12/21 Jiaju Zhang <jjzhang at suse.de>:
> On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 15:44 +0900, Yuichi SEINO wrote:
>> Hi Jiaju,
>>
>> 2012/12/18 Jiaju Zhang <jjzhang at suse.de>:
>> > On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 10:40 +0900, Yuichi SEINO wrote:
>> >> Hi Jiaju,
>> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Perhaps,  this problem didn't happen before the following commit.
>> >> >> >> https://github.com/jjzhang/booth/commit/4b00d46480f45a205f2550ff0760c8b372009f7f
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Currently when all of the initialization (including loading the new
>> >> >> > ticket information) finished, booth should be regarded as ready. So if
>> >> >> > you encounter some problem here, I guess we should improve the RA to
>> >> >> > better reflect the booth startup status, but not moving the
>> >> >> > initialization order, since it may introduce other regression as we have
>> >> >> > encountered before;)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I am not still sure which we should fix RA or booth.
>> >> >
>> >> > I suggest to add a new function to clear the old ticket info in the CIB,
>> >> > and call that function when booth just run but before deamonized. So,
>> >> > before booth_start in the RA returned, the stale data has been cleared.
>> >> > What do you think about this?;)
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> In the case of using cib info, Can you implement it? For example,
>> >> booth is fail-over on local. Then, booth need to get the ticket in
>> >> cib. If there is no this problem, I can agree to it.
>> >
>> > OK, I'll implement it;)
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Jiaju
>> >
>> >
>>
>> OK, thanks.
>> Are you going to implement it in the next development ?
>
> Sure, I will;)
>
> Thanks,
> Jiaju
>



--
Yuichi SEINO
METROSYSTEMS CORPORATION
E-mail:seino.cluster2 at gmail.com